TY - JOUR
T1 - Innovating Technology-Enhanced Interventions for Youth Suicide
T2 - Insights for Measuring Implementation Outcomes
AU - Szlyk, Hannah S.
AU - Tan, Jia
AU - Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T32MH019960.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Susan Fowler, The Brown School librarian, for her assistance with designing search term hedges, and Drs. Leopoldo J. Cabassa, Sean Joe, and members of the Race and Opportunity Lab at Washington University for providing feedback on this project. Funding. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T32MH019960.
Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2021 Szlyk, Tan and Lengnick-Hall.
PY - 2021/6/3
Y1 - 2021/6/3
N2 - Technology is one medium to increase youth engagement, especially among underserved and minority groups, in suicide preventive interventions. Technology can be used to supplement or adjunct an in-person intervention, guide an in-person intervention, or be the stand-alone (automated) component of the intervention. This range in technological use is now called the continuum of behavioral intervention technologies (BITs). Overall, suicide intervention researchers do not use this terminology to categorize how the role of technology differs across technology-enhanced youth interventions. There is growing recognition that technology-enhanced interventions will not create substantial public health impact without an understanding of the individual (youth, families, and providers), mezzo (clinics and health systems of care), and contextual factors (society, culture, community) that are associated with their implementation. Implementation science is the study of methods to promote uptake of evidence-based practices and policies into the broader health care system. In this review, we incorporate work from implementation science and BIT implementation to illustrate how the study of technology-enhanced interventions for youth suicide can be advanced by specifying the role of technology and measuring implementation outcomes.
AB - Technology is one medium to increase youth engagement, especially among underserved and minority groups, in suicide preventive interventions. Technology can be used to supplement or adjunct an in-person intervention, guide an in-person intervention, or be the stand-alone (automated) component of the intervention. This range in technological use is now called the continuum of behavioral intervention technologies (BITs). Overall, suicide intervention researchers do not use this terminology to categorize how the role of technology differs across technology-enhanced youth interventions. There is growing recognition that technology-enhanced interventions will not create substantial public health impact without an understanding of the individual (youth, families, and providers), mezzo (clinics and health systems of care), and contextual factors (society, culture, community) that are associated with their implementation. Implementation science is the study of methods to promote uptake of evidence-based practices and policies into the broader health care system. In this review, we incorporate work from implementation science and BIT implementation to illustrate how the study of technology-enhanced interventions for youth suicide can be advanced by specifying the role of technology and measuring implementation outcomes.
KW - implementation science
KW - psychosocial intervention
KW - suicidality
KW - technology
KW - youth
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85108238283
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657303
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657303
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34149543
AN - SCOPUS:85108238283
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 657303
ER -