Initial versus sequential adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy: A review of the current data

Matthew J. Ellis, Caron E. Rigden

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


Objective: One of the principle unresolved questions in adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer is whether it is more beneficial for women to receive aromatase inhibitor (Al) monotherapy or start with tamoxifen and then switch to Al therapy. This review will compare the current available efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness data for Als in the initial adjuvant and switch adjuvant settings. Methods: A search of the Medline database from 1976 through 2006 was performed for the following terms: breast cancer, adjuvant, aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, tamoxifen, sequential, switching. A search for relevant abstracts from the EBCC, ECCO, ASCO, and SABCS conferences was also performed. Results: In the upfront adjuvant setting, anastrozole and letrozole have both demonstrated a significant disease-free survival (DFS) benefit over tamoxifen. Upfront therapy with a non-steroidal Al appears to be most critical for patients at risk of an early relapse, illustrated by the finding that upfront letrozole provided a significant early DPS advantage over tamoxifen only in patients with node-positive disease (hazard ratio = 0.71, p < 0.001). With respect to safety, both strategies have similar adverse event profiles. From an economic perspective, Als, whether used upfront or sequentially, are considered cost-effective compared with tamoxifen due to the cost savings associated with a reduction in the breast cancer event rate. From the efficacy standpoint, modeling studies have produced inconsistent results and do not produce definitive data. Conclusions: Differences in patient populations, definitions of end points, and prior tamoxifen usage between the trials discussed necessitates a careful interpretation but may provide insights in the treatment decision-making process. The BIG 1-98 trial was designed to compare letrozole monotherapy versus a letrozole-to-tamoxifen or reverse-sequence approach and should provide insights to the question of optimal therapy. Until results are available, for higher-risk patients (i.e., those with positive lymph nodes), initiation of treatment with a non-steroidal Al may be beneficial to avoid tamoxifen-associated early relapses that occur in the first 2 years after diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2479-2487
Number of pages9
JournalCurrent Medical Research and Opinion
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2006


  • Adjuvant
  • Aromatase inhibitors
  • Breast cancer
  • Letrozole
  • Tamoxifen


Dive into the research topics of 'Initial versus sequential adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy: A review of the current data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this