TY - JOUR
T1 - Informed Consent to Research with Cognitively Impaired Adults
T2 - Transdisciplinary Challenges and Opportunities
AU - Prusaczyk, Beth
AU - Cherney, Steven M.
AU - Carpenter, Christopher R.
AU - DuBois, James M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Due to issues related to informed research consent, older adults with cognitive impairments are often excluded from high-quality studies that are not directly related to cognitive impairment, which has led to a dearth of evidence for this population. The challenges to including cognitively impaired older adults in research and the implications of their exclusion are a transdisciplinary issue. The ethical challenges and logistical barriers to conducting research with cognitively impaired older adults are addressed from the perspectives of three different fields—social work, emergency medicine, and orthopaedic surgery. Issues related to funding, study design, intervention components, and outcomes are discussed through the unique experiences of three different providers. A fourth perspective—medical research ethics—provides alternatives to exclusion when conducting research with cognitively impaired older adults such as timing, corrective feedback and plain language, and capacity assessment and proxy appointments. Given the increasing aging population and the lack of evidence on cognitively impaired older adults, it is critical that researchers, funders, and institutional review boards not be dissuaded from including this population in research studies.
AB - Due to issues related to informed research consent, older adults with cognitive impairments are often excluded from high-quality studies that are not directly related to cognitive impairment, which has led to a dearth of evidence for this population. The challenges to including cognitively impaired older adults in research and the implications of their exclusion are a transdisciplinary issue. The ethical challenges and logistical barriers to conducting research with cognitively impaired older adults are addressed from the perspectives of three different fields—social work, emergency medicine, and orthopaedic surgery. Issues related to funding, study design, intervention components, and outcomes are discussed through the unique experiences of three different providers. A fourth perspective—medical research ethics—provides alternatives to exclusion when conducting research with cognitively impaired older adults such as timing, corrective feedback and plain language, and capacity assessment and proxy appointments. Given the increasing aging population and the lack of evidence on cognitively impaired older adults, it is critical that researchers, funders, and institutional review boards not be dissuaded from including this population in research studies.
KW - Cognitive impairment
KW - ethics
KW - informed consent
KW - older adults
KW - transdisciplinary
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979697494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07317115.2016.1201714
DO - 10.1080/07317115.2016.1201714
M3 - Article
C2 - 28452628
AN - SCOPUS:84979697494
SN - 0731-7115
VL - 40
SP - 63
EP - 73
JO - Clinical Gerontologist
JF - Clinical Gerontologist
IS - 1
ER -