Abstract
An enduring puzzle is why credit rating agencies (CRAs) use a few categories to describe credit qualities lying in a continuum, even when ratings coarseness reduces welfare. We model a cheap-talk game in which a CRA assigns positive weights to the divergent goals of issuing firms and investors. The CRA wishes to inflate ratings but prefers an unbiased rating to one whose inflation exceeds a threshold. Ratings coarseness arises in equilibrium to preclude excessive rating inflation. We show that competition among CRAs can increase ratings coarseness. We also examine the welfare implications of regulatory initiatives.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 541-557 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Financial Economics |
| Volume | 115 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2015 |
Keywords
- Cheap talk
- Coarseness
- Credit quality
- Credit ratings