@article{47daeeb8a478485baf2b6c5ee1d75264,
title = "Influences of Repair Site Tension and Conduit Splinting on Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction",
abstract = "Background: We investigated the use of a conduit splinting technique to mitigate tension at the coaptation site of a rodent nerve defect model to determine the optimal reconstruction method for segmental nerve defects. Methods: A rat sciatic nerve segmental defect model was created by excising 5mm of the sciatic nerve unilaterally. Four groups of 10 rats were each reconstructed using 1 of 4 techniques: primary repair, repair with conduit splinting, reverse isograft with conduit splinting, and reverse isograft without splinting. Functional outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks by measurement of Sciatic Functional Index (SFI), and sciatic nerves were harvested at the nonsurvival surgery. Histomorphologic measurements were reported as a value normalized to the average measurements of the control side. The primary outcomes were assessment of nerve continuity and the proportion of nerve fibers in the regenerating nerve compared with the uninjured side. Results: The number of repair site rupture rates was lower when a conduit splint was used—less than half of the primary repairs under tension remained intact at 6 weeks. No difference was seen in axon number, size, and density between primary repairs and those augmented by conduit splints, but worse functional outcomes and more debris were present compared with the intact primary repairs. Conclusions: Nerve conduit splinting reduced rupture rates, particularly for nerve repairs associated with a segmental defect. No significant difference was seen in the number of axons among techniques. Primary nerve repair under tension that did not rupture demonstrated superior SFI.",
keywords = "gap, peripheral nerve, segmental defect, tension",
author = "Brogan, {David M.} and Dy, {Christopher J.} and Dana Rioux-Forker and Jason Wever and Leversedge, {Fraser J.}",
note = "Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number KL2 TR002346. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Funding for pilot data was received from the American Foundation for Surgery of the Hand as a Resident and Fellow Fast Track Grant. Peripheral nerve conduits used in this study were received as an in-kind donation by Axogen, Inc. Funding was provided in part by a KL-2 Career Development Award for Dr Brogan from the University of Missouri/Washington University in St. Louis. Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number KL2 TR002346. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Funding for pilot data was received from the American Foundation for Surgery of the Hand as a Resident and Fellow Fast Track Grant. Peripheral nerve conduits used in this study were received as an in-kind donation by Axogen, Inc. Funding was provided in part by a KL-2 Career Development Award for Dr Brogan from the University of Missouri/Washington University in St. Louis. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020.",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1177/1558944720974117",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "1048--1054",
journal = "Hand",
issn = "1558-9447",
number = "6",
}