Abstract

Objective To examine the independent and interactive influences of neuroimaging biomarkers on retrospective cognitive decline. Methods A total of 152 middle-aged and older adult participants with at least 2 clinical and cognitive assessments, a Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0 or 0.5, and a flortaucipir (18 F-AV-1451) tau PET scan, a florbetapir (18 F-AV-45) amyloid PET scan, and a structural MRI scan were recruited from the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center at Washington University in St. Louis. Cognition was assessed with standard measures reflecting episodic memory, executive functioning, semantic fluency, and processing speed. Results Results from retrospective longitudinal analyses showed that each biomarker had a univariate association with the global cognitive composite; however, when each marker was analyzed in a single statistical model, only tau was a significant predictor of global cognitive decline. There was an interaction between tau and amyloid such that tau-related cognitive decline was worse in individuals with high amyloid. There was also an interaction with hippocampal volume indicating that individuals with high levels of all 3 pathologies exhibited the greatest declines in cognition. Additional analyses within each cognitive domain indicated that tau had the largest negative influence on tests of episodic memory and executive functioning. Conclusions Together, these results suggest that increasing levels of tau most consistently relate to declines in cognition preceding biomarker collection. These findings support models of Alzheimer disease (AD) staging that suggest that elevated β-amyloid alone may be insufficient to produce cognitive change in individuals at risk for AD and support the use of multiple biomarkers to stage AD progression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e859-e866
JournalNeurology
Volume91
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 28 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of tau PET, amyloid PET, and hippocampal volume on cognition in Alzheimer disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this