TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of QRS duration on outcome of death or appropriate defibrillator therapy by strategy of left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients
AU - Saba, Samir
AU - Marek, Josef
AU - Alam, Mian Bilal
AU - Adelstein, Evan
AU - Schwartzman, David
AU - Jain, Sandeep
AU - Gorcsan, John
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosures Dr. Adelstein receives research grant support from St. Jude Medical; Dr. Schwartzman receives research grant support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Biosense and is a consultant for Atricure, Avery-Dennison, Biosense, Estech, and Medtronic; Dr. Jain receives research grant support from Medtronic; Dr. Gorcsan receives research grant support from Biotronik, GE, Toshiba, Medtronic, and St. Jude Medical; Dr. Saba receives research grant support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and St. Jude Medical and is a consultant for Medtronic.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This study was supported in part by an American Heart Association grant-in-aid (grant no. 0855526D to SS).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2014/12/9
Y1 - 2014/12/9
N2 - Purpose: Echocardiography-guided (EG) lead placement at the site of latest left ventricular (LV) mechanical activation improves outcome in patients receiving a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillator (D). The purpose of this study is to examine whether a strategy of EG LV lead placement equally improves outcome in CRT recipients with wide (≥150 ms) versus intermediate (120–149 ms) QRS duration.Methods: Patients treated with a CRT-D in the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region (STARTER) prospective, randomized trial (108 EG strategy and 75 routine strategy) were followed to the endpoint of death or first appropriate CRT-D therapy. Of the patients enrolled in STARTER, 115 had QRS ≥ 150 ms and 68 had 120 < QRS ≤ 149 ms.Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 3.7 ± 2.1 years, 62 (33 %) patients died and 40 (22 %) received appropriate CRT-D therapy. Compared to patients with QRS ≥ 150 ms, patients with intermediate QRS had meaningfully worse survival free from ICD therapy (HR = 1.48, p = 0.056). CRT-D therapy-free survival was significantly worse in patients with intermediate QRS duration randomized to the routine LV lead placement strategy, compared to patients with intermediate QRS duration randomized to the EG LV lead placement strategy or patients with wide QRS duration regardless of LV implantation strategy (HR = 2.08, 95 % confidence interval = 1.21–3.56, P = 0.008). This finding was independent in type of cardiomyopathy.Conclusion: A strategy of EG LV lead placement improves survival free from defibrillator therapy in patients with QRS between 120–149 ms to levels comparable to those of patients with QRS ≥ 150 ms.
AB - Purpose: Echocardiography-guided (EG) lead placement at the site of latest left ventricular (LV) mechanical activation improves outcome in patients receiving a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillator (D). The purpose of this study is to examine whether a strategy of EG LV lead placement equally improves outcome in CRT recipients with wide (≥150 ms) versus intermediate (120–149 ms) QRS duration.Methods: Patients treated with a CRT-D in the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region (STARTER) prospective, randomized trial (108 EG strategy and 75 routine strategy) were followed to the endpoint of death or first appropriate CRT-D therapy. Of the patients enrolled in STARTER, 115 had QRS ≥ 150 ms and 68 had 120 < QRS ≤ 149 ms.Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 3.7 ± 2.1 years, 62 (33 %) patients died and 40 (22 %) received appropriate CRT-D therapy. Compared to patients with QRS ≥ 150 ms, patients with intermediate QRS had meaningfully worse survival free from ICD therapy (HR = 1.48, p = 0.056). CRT-D therapy-free survival was significantly worse in patients with intermediate QRS duration randomized to the routine LV lead placement strategy, compared to patients with intermediate QRS duration randomized to the EG LV lead placement strategy or patients with wide QRS duration regardless of LV implantation strategy (HR = 2.08, 95 % confidence interval = 1.21–3.56, P = 0.008). This finding was independent in type of cardiomyopathy.Conclusion: A strategy of EG LV lead placement improves survival free from defibrillator therapy in patients with QRS between 120–149 ms to levels comparable to those of patients with QRS ≥ 150 ms.
KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy
KW - Death
KW - Defibrillator therapy
KW - QRS duration
KW - Targeted lead placement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84916234338
U2 - 10.1007/s10840-014-9953-4
DO - 10.1007/s10840-014-9953-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 25391355
AN - SCOPUS:84916234338
SN - 1383-875X
VL - 41
SP - 211
EP - 215
JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
IS - 3
ER -