Indications and interpretation of esophageal function testing

  • C. Prakash Gyawali
  • , Nicola de Bortoli
  • , John Clarke
  • , Carla Marinelli
  • , Salvatore Tolone
  • , Sabine Roman
  • , Edoardo Savarino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Esophageal symptoms are common, and can arise from mucosal, motor, functional, and neoplastic processes, among others. Judicious use of diagnostic testing can help define the etiology of symptoms and can direct management. Endoscopy, esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM), ambulatory pH or pH-impedance manometry, and barium radiography are commonly used for esophageal function testing; functional lumen imaging probe is an emerging option. Recent consensus guidelines have provided direction in using test findings toward defining mechanisms of esophageal symptoms. The Chicago Classification describes hierarchical steps in diagnosing esophageal motility disorders. The Lyon Consensus characterizes conclusive evidence on esophageal testing for a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and establishes a motor classification of GERD. Taking these recent advances into consideration, our discussion focuses primarily on the indications, technique, equipment, and interpretation of esophageal HRM and ambulatory reflux monitoring in the evaluation of esophageal symptoms, and describes indications for alternative esophageal tests.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-253
Number of pages15
JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume1434
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2018

Keywords

  • ambulatory pH monitoring
  • barium radiography
  • functional lumen imaging probe
  • high-resolution manometry
  • pH-impedance monitoring

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indications and interpretation of esophageal function testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this