TY - JOUR
T1 - Indications and interpretation of esophageal function testing
AU - Gyawali, C. Prakash
AU - de Bortoli, Nicola
AU - Clarke, John
AU - Marinelli, Carla
AU - Tolone, Salvatore
AU - Roman, Sabine
AU - Savarino, Edoardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Esophageal symptoms are common, and can arise from mucosal, motor, functional, and neoplastic processes, among others. Judicious use of diagnostic testing can help define the etiology of symptoms and can direct management. Endoscopy, esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM), ambulatory pH or pH-impedance manometry, and barium radiography are commonly used for esophageal function testing; functional lumen imaging probe is an emerging option. Recent consensus guidelines have provided direction in using test findings toward defining mechanisms of esophageal symptoms. The Chicago Classification describes hierarchical steps in diagnosing esophageal motility disorders. The Lyon Consensus characterizes conclusive evidence on esophageal testing for a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and establishes a motor classification of GERD. Taking these recent advances into consideration, our discussion focuses primarily on the indications, technique, equipment, and interpretation of esophageal HRM and ambulatory reflux monitoring in the evaluation of esophageal symptoms, and describes indications for alternative esophageal tests.
AB - Esophageal symptoms are common, and can arise from mucosal, motor, functional, and neoplastic processes, among others. Judicious use of diagnostic testing can help define the etiology of symptoms and can direct management. Endoscopy, esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM), ambulatory pH or pH-impedance manometry, and barium radiography are commonly used for esophageal function testing; functional lumen imaging probe is an emerging option. Recent consensus guidelines have provided direction in using test findings toward defining mechanisms of esophageal symptoms. The Chicago Classification describes hierarchical steps in diagnosing esophageal motility disorders. The Lyon Consensus characterizes conclusive evidence on esophageal testing for a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and establishes a motor classification of GERD. Taking these recent advances into consideration, our discussion focuses primarily on the indications, technique, equipment, and interpretation of esophageal HRM and ambulatory reflux monitoring in the evaluation of esophageal symptoms, and describes indications for alternative esophageal tests.
KW - ambulatory pH monitoring
KW - barium radiography
KW - functional lumen imaging probe
KW - high-resolution manometry
KW - pH-impedance monitoring
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85047388175
U2 - 10.1111/nyas.13709
DO - 10.1111/nyas.13709
M3 - Article
C2 - 29754440
AN - SCOPUS:85047388175
SN - 0077-8923
VL - 1434
SP - 239
EP - 253
JO - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
JF - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
IS - 1
ER -