Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration

  • Mehdi Mohamadnejad
  • , Daniel Mullady
  • , Dayna S. Early
  • , Brian Collins
  • , Carrie Marshall
  • , Sharon Sams
  • , Roy Yen
  • , Mona Rizeq
  • , Maria Romanas
  • , Samia Nawaz
  • , Ozlem Ulusarac
  • , Thomas Hollander
  • , Robert H. Wilson
  • , Violette C. Simon
  • , Vladimir Kushnir
  • , Stuart K. Amateau
  • , Brian C. Brauer
  • , Srinivas Gaddam
  • , Riad R. Azar
  • , Srinadh Komanduri
  • Raj Shah, Ananya Das, Steven Edmundowicz, V. Raman Muthusamy, Amit Rastogi, Sachin Wani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background & Aims It is not clear exactly how many passes are required to determine whether pancreatic masses are malignant using endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). We aimed to define the per-pass diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for establishing the malignancy of a pancreatic mass, and identify factors associated with detection of malignancies. Methods In a prospective study, 239 patients with solid pancreatic masses were randomly assigned to groups that underwent EUS-FNA, with the number of passes determined by an on-site cytopathology evaluation or set at 7 passes, at 3 tertiary referral centers. A final diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy was made based on findings from cytology, surgery, or a follow-up evaluation at least 1 year after EUS-FNA. The cumulative sensitivity of detection of malignancy by EUS-FNA was calculated after each pass; in the primary analysis, lesions categorized as malignant or suspicious were considered as positive findings. Results Pancreatic malignancies were found in 202 patients (84.5% of the study population). EUS-FNA detected malignancies with 96% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 92%–98%); 4 passes of EUS-FNA detected malignancies with 92% sensitivity (95% CI, 87%–95%). Tumor size greater than 2 cm was the only variable associated with positive results from cytology analysis (odds ratio, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.9–31.6). In masses larger than 2 cm, 4 passes of EUS-FNA detected malignancies with 93% sensitivity (95% CI, 89%–96%) and in masses ≤2 cm, 6 passes was associated with 82% sensitivity (95% CI, 61%–93%). Sensitivity of detection did not increase with increasing number of passes. Conclusions In a prospective study, we found 4 passes of EUS-FNA to be sufficient to detect malignant pancreatic masses; increasing the number of passes did not increase the sensitivity of detection. Tumor size greater than 2 cm was associated with malignancy, and a greater number of passes may be required to evaluate masses 2 cm or less. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01386931.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1071-1078.e2
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2017

Keywords

  • Cytopathology
  • Endoscopic Ultrasonography
  • Fine-Needle Aspiration
  • Pancreatic Cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this