Inadequate Housing Among Families Under Investigation for Child Abuse and Neglect: Prevalence from a National Probability Sample

  • Patrick J. Fowler
  • , David B. Henry
  • , Michael Schoeny
  • , John Landsverk
  • , Dina Chavira
  • , Jeremy J. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of inadequate housing that threaten out-of-home placement among families under investigation by child welfare. Data came from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being, a nationally representative longitudinal survey of child welfare-involved families. Child protective services caseworkers as well as caregivers provided information on families whose child remained in the home after initial investigation (N = 3,867). Multilevel latent class analyses tested the presence of inadequately housed subgroups using 4 housing problem indicators at baseline. Logistic regressions assessed convergent and predictive validity. A two class latent solution best fit the data. Findings indicated that inadequate housing contributed to risk for out-of-home placement in approximately 16 % of intact families under investigation by child protective services. These families were 4 times more likely to need housing services 12 months later. Federal legislation emphasizes integration of social services as necessary to end homelessness. This study demonstrates overlap across public agencies. Enhanced coordination of child welfare and housing services facilitates interventions to prevent and mitigate homelessness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-114
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Community Psychology
Volume52
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Keywords

  • Child welfare
  • Homelessness
  • Housing
  • Latent class analysis
  • Policy
  • Systems of care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inadequate Housing Among Families Under Investigation for Child Abuse and Neglect: Prevalence from a National Probability Sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this