TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients
AU - Dogan, Nesrin
AU - Siebers, Jeffery V.
AU - Keall, Paul J.
AU - Lerma, Fritz
AU - Wu, Yan
AU - Fatyga, Mirek
AU - Williamson, Jeffrey F.
AU - Schmidt-Ullrich, Rupert K.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - The purpose of this work is to investigate the effect of dose-calculation accuracy on head and neck (H&N) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans by determining the systematic dose-prediction and optimization- convergence errors (DPEs and OCEs), using a superposition/convolution (SC) algorithm. Ten patients with locally advanced H&N squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with simultaneous integrated boost IMRT were selected for this study. The targets consisted of gross target volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and nodal target volumes (CTV nodes). The critical structures included spinal cord, parotid glands, and brainstem. For all patients, three IMRT plans were created: A: an SC optimized plan (SCopt), B: an SCopt plan recalculated with Monte Carlo [MC (SCopt)], and C: an MC optimized plan (MCopt). For each structure, DPEs and OCEs were estimated as DPESC = DB - DA and OCE SC = DC - DB where A, B, and C stand for the three different optimized plans as defined above. Deliverable optimization was used for all plans, that is, a leaf-sequencing step was incorporated into the optimization loop at each iteration. The range of DPESC in the GTV D98 varied from -1.9% to -4.9%, while the OCESC ranged from 0.9% to 7.0%. The DPESC in the contralateral parotid D 50 reached 8.2%, while the OCESC in the contralateral parotid D50 varied from 0.91% to 6.99%. The DPESC in cord D2 reached -3.0%, while the OCESC reached to -7.0%. The magnitude of the DPESC and OCESC differences demonstrate the importance of using the most accurate available algorithm in the deliverable IMRT optimization process, especially for the estimation of normal structure doses.
AB - The purpose of this work is to investigate the effect of dose-calculation accuracy on head and neck (H&N) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans by determining the systematic dose-prediction and optimization- convergence errors (DPEs and OCEs), using a superposition/convolution (SC) algorithm. Ten patients with locally advanced H&N squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with simultaneous integrated boost IMRT were selected for this study. The targets consisted of gross target volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and nodal target volumes (CTV nodes). The critical structures included spinal cord, parotid glands, and brainstem. For all patients, three IMRT plans were created: A: an SC optimized plan (SCopt), B: an SCopt plan recalculated with Monte Carlo [MC (SCopt)], and C: an MC optimized plan (MCopt). For each structure, DPEs and OCEs were estimated as DPESC = DB - DA and OCE SC = DC - DB where A, B, and C stand for the three different optimized plans as defined above. Deliverable optimization was used for all plans, that is, a leaf-sequencing step was incorporated into the optimization loop at each iteration. The range of DPESC in the GTV D98 varied from -1.9% to -4.9%, while the OCESC ranged from 0.9% to 7.0%. The DPESC in the contralateral parotid D 50 reached 8.2%, while the OCESC in the contralateral parotid D50 varied from 0.91% to 6.99%. The DPESC in cord D2 reached -3.0%, while the OCESC reached to -7.0%. The magnitude of the DPESC and OCESC differences demonstrate the importance of using the most accurate available algorithm in the deliverable IMRT optimization process, especially for the estimation of normal structure doses.
KW - Dose calculation accuracy
KW - Dose-prediction error
KW - Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)
KW - Monte Carlo
KW - Optimization-convergence error
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750569380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1118/1.2357835
DO - 10.1118/1.2357835
M3 - Article
C2 - 17153383
AN - SCOPUS:33750569380
SN - 0094-2405
VL - 33
SP - 4033
EP - 4043
JO - Medical physics
JF - Medical physics
IS - 11
ER -