TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved identification of abdominal aortic aneurysm using the Kernelized Expectation Maximization algorithm
AU - Deidda, Daniel
AU - Akerele, Mercy I.
AU - Aykroyd, Robert G.
AU - Dweck, Marc R.
AU - Ferreira, Kelley
AU - Forsythe, Rachael O.
AU - Heetun, Warda
AU - Newby, David E.
AU - Syed, Maaz
AU - Tsoumpas, Charalampos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors.
PY - 2021/6/28
Y1 - 2021/6/28
N2 - Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) monitoring and risk of rupture is currently assumed to be correlated with the aneurysm diameter. Aneurysm growth, however, has been demonstrated to be unpredictable. Using PET to measure uptake of [ 18 F]-NaF in calcified lesions of the abdominal aorta has been shown to be useful for identifying AAA and to predict its growth. The PET low spatial resolution, however, can affect the accuracy of the diagnosis. Advanced edge-preserving reconstruction algorithms can overcome this issue. The kernel method has been demonstrated to provide noise suppression while retaining emission and edge information. Nevertheless, these findings were obtained using simulations, phantoms and a limited amount of patient data. In this study, the authors aim to investigate the usefulness of the anatomically guided kernelized expectation maximization (KEM) and the hybrid KEM (HKEM) methods and to judge the statistical significance of the related improvements. Sixty-one datasets of patients with AAA and 11 from control patients were reconstructed with ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), HKEM and KEM and the analysis was carried out using the target-to-blood-pool ratio, and a series of statistical tests. The results show that all algorithms have similar diagnostic power, but HKEM and KEM can significantly recover uptake of lesions and improve the accuracy of the diagnosis by up to 22% compared to OSEM. The same improvements are likely to be obtained in clinical applications based on the quantification of small lesions, like for example cancer. This article is part of the theme issue 'Synergistic tomographic image reconstruction: Part 1'.
AB - Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) monitoring and risk of rupture is currently assumed to be correlated with the aneurysm diameter. Aneurysm growth, however, has been demonstrated to be unpredictable. Using PET to measure uptake of [ 18 F]-NaF in calcified lesions of the abdominal aorta has been shown to be useful for identifying AAA and to predict its growth. The PET low spatial resolution, however, can affect the accuracy of the diagnosis. Advanced edge-preserving reconstruction algorithms can overcome this issue. The kernel method has been demonstrated to provide noise suppression while retaining emission and edge information. Nevertheless, these findings were obtained using simulations, phantoms and a limited amount of patient data. In this study, the authors aim to investigate the usefulness of the anatomically guided kernelized expectation maximization (KEM) and the hybrid KEM (HKEM) methods and to judge the statistical significance of the related improvements. Sixty-one datasets of patients with AAA and 11 from control patients were reconstructed with ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), HKEM and KEM and the analysis was carried out using the target-to-blood-pool ratio, and a series of statistical tests. The results show that all algorithms have similar diagnostic power, but HKEM and KEM can significantly recover uptake of lesions and improve the accuracy of the diagnosis by up to 22% compared to OSEM. The same improvements are likely to be obtained in clinical applications based on the quantification of small lesions, like for example cancer. This article is part of the theme issue 'Synergistic tomographic image reconstruction: Part 1'.
KW - PET
KW - PET/CT
KW - aortic aneurysm
KW - kernel method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105753629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rsta.2020.0201
DO - 10.1098/rsta.2020.0201
M3 - Article
C2 - 33966459
AN - SCOPUS:85105753629
SN - 1364-503X
VL - 379
JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
IS - 2200
M1 - 20200201
ER -