TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved gastrointestinal profile with diroximel fumarate is associated with a positive impact on quality of life compared with dimethyl fumarate
T2 - results from the randomized, double-blind, phase III EVOLVE-MS-2 study
AU - Wundes, Annette
AU - Wray, Sibyl
AU - Gold, Ralf
AU - Singer, Barry A.
AU - Jasinska, Elzbieta
AU - Ziemssen, Tjalf
AU - de Seze, Jerome
AU - Repovic, Pavle
AU - Chen, Hailu
AU - Hanna, Jerome
AU - Messer, Jordan
AU - Miller, Catherine
AU - Naismith, Robert T.
N1 - Funding Information:
AW reports advisor fees from Biogen and AbbVie; and research support from AbbVie, Alkermes, and Biogen. SW reports consulting fees from Biogen, EMD Serono, Genentech-Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme; speaker bureaus for Biogen, EMD Serono, Genentech/Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme; and research support from Alkermes, Biogen, Celgene, Genentech/Roche, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TG. RG reports honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Teva Neuroscience; and research support from Bayer, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Teva Neuroscience. BAS reports speaker/consulting fees from AbbVie, Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Genentech, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, and TG; and research support from AbbVie, Alkermes, Biogen, MedImmune, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. EJ reports advisory boards for Biogen; and speaker fees from Adamed, Allergan, Novartis, Polpharma, Roche, and Teva. TZ reports advisory boards for Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Synthon, and Teva; speaker fees from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva; and research support from Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva. JDS reports honoraria from Biogen for advisory boards and consulting. PR reports speaker/consulting fees from Alexion, Biogen, Celgene, EMD Serono, Medison, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Viela Bio. HC, JH, JM, and CM are employees of and hold stock/stock options in Biogen. RTN reports advisor/speaker/consulting fees from Alexion, Alkermes, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, EMD Serono, Genentech, Lundbeck, NervGen, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Third Rock, and Viela Bio. The Editor-in-Chief of Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is an author of this paper, therefore, the peer review process was managed by alternative members of the Board and the Editor was not involved in the decision-making process.
Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: this work was supported by Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a novel oral fumarate approved for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). DRF demonstrated significantly improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability versus dimethyl fumarate (DMF) with fewer days of Individual Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (IGISIS) scores ⩾2, GI adverse events (AEs), and treatment discontinuations due to GI AEs. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of GI tolerability events on quality of life (QoL) for patients with relapsing–remitting MS who received DRF or DMF in EVOLVE-MS-2. Methods: A post hoc analysis was conducted in patients who were enrolled in the randomized, blinded, 5-week, EVOLVE-MS-2 [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03093324] study of DRF versus DMF. Patients completed daily IGISIS and Global GISIS (GGISIS) eDiary questionnaires to assess GI symptom intensity and interference with daily activities and work. Results: In total, 504 patients (DRF, n = 253; DMF, n = 251) received study drug and 502 (DRF, n = 253; DMF, n = 249) completed at least one post-baseline questionnaire. With DRF, GI symptoms were less likely to interfere ‘quite a bit’ or ‘extremely’ with regular daily activities [IGISIS: DRF, 9.5% (24/253) versus DMF, 28.9% (72/249)] or work productivity [GGISIS: DRF, 6.1% (10/165) versus DMF, 11.3% (18/159)]. DRF-treated patients had fewer days with ⩾1 h of missed work (DRF, 43 days, n = 20 versus DMF, 88 days, n = 26). DMF-treated patients reported highest GI symptom severity and missed work at week 2–3 shortly after completing the titration period, which coincided with the majority of GI-related treatment discontinuations [58.3% (7/12)]. GI tolerability AEs [DRF, 34.8% (88/253); DMF, 48.2% (121/251)], concomitant symptomatic medication use [DRF, 19.3% (17/88) versus DMF, 30.6% (37/121)], and GI-related discontinuations (DRF, 0.8% versus DMF, 4.8%) were lower with DRF versus DMF. Conclusions: The improved GI tolerability with DRF translated into clinically meaningful benefits to QoL, as patients experienced less impact on daily life and work and required less concomitant symptomatic medication use. Trial registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03093324].
AB - Background: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a novel oral fumarate approved for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). DRF demonstrated significantly improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability versus dimethyl fumarate (DMF) with fewer days of Individual Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (IGISIS) scores ⩾2, GI adverse events (AEs), and treatment discontinuations due to GI AEs. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of GI tolerability events on quality of life (QoL) for patients with relapsing–remitting MS who received DRF or DMF in EVOLVE-MS-2. Methods: A post hoc analysis was conducted in patients who were enrolled in the randomized, blinded, 5-week, EVOLVE-MS-2 [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03093324] study of DRF versus DMF. Patients completed daily IGISIS and Global GISIS (GGISIS) eDiary questionnaires to assess GI symptom intensity and interference with daily activities and work. Results: In total, 504 patients (DRF, n = 253; DMF, n = 251) received study drug and 502 (DRF, n = 253; DMF, n = 249) completed at least one post-baseline questionnaire. With DRF, GI symptoms were less likely to interfere ‘quite a bit’ or ‘extremely’ with regular daily activities [IGISIS: DRF, 9.5% (24/253) versus DMF, 28.9% (72/249)] or work productivity [GGISIS: DRF, 6.1% (10/165) versus DMF, 11.3% (18/159)]. DRF-treated patients had fewer days with ⩾1 h of missed work (DRF, 43 days, n = 20 versus DMF, 88 days, n = 26). DMF-treated patients reported highest GI symptom severity and missed work at week 2–3 shortly after completing the titration period, which coincided with the majority of GI-related treatment discontinuations [58.3% (7/12)]. GI tolerability AEs [DRF, 34.8% (88/253); DMF, 48.2% (121/251)], concomitant symptomatic medication use [DRF, 19.3% (17/88) versus DMF, 30.6% (37/121)], and GI-related discontinuations (DRF, 0.8% versus DMF, 4.8%) were lower with DRF versus DMF. Conclusions: The improved GI tolerability with DRF translated into clinically meaningful benefits to QoL, as patients experienced less impact on daily life and work and required less concomitant symptomatic medication use. Trial registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03093324].
KW - clinical trial
KW - diroximel fumarate
KW - disease-modifying therapy
KW - gastrointestinal
KW - relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102763255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1756286421993999
DO - 10.1177/1756286421993999
M3 - Article
C2 - 33796143
AN - SCOPUS:85102763255
SN - 1756-2856
VL - 14
JO - Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
JF - Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
ER -