Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks

Matthias Kliegel, Mike Martin, Mark A. McDaniel, Gilles O. Einstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

141 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the present study we manipulated the importance of performing two event-based prospective memory tasks. In Experiment 1, the event-based task was assumed to rely on relatively automatic processes, whereas in Experiment 2 the event-based task was assumed to rely on a more demanding monitoring process. In contrast to the first experiment, the second experiment showed that importance had a positive effect on prospective memory performance. In addition, the occurrence of an importance effect on prospective memory performance seemed to be mainly due to the features of the prospective memory task itself, and not to the characteristics of the ongoing tasks that only influenced the size of the importance effect. The results suggest that importance instructions may improve prospective memory if the prospective task requires the strategic allocation of attentional monitoring resources.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)553-561
Number of pages9
JournalMemory
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this