Implementation strategies

Joann E. Kirchner; Thomas J. Waltz; Byron J. Powell; Jeffrey L. Smith; Enola K. Proctor

doi:10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0015

Implementation strategies

Joann E. Kirchner
, Thomas J. Waltz
, Byron J. Powell
, Jeffrey L. Smith
, Enola K. Proctor

Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (ICTS)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

As the field of implementation science moves beyond studying barriers to and facilitators of implementation to the comparative effectiveness of different strategies, it is essential that we create a common taxonomy to define the strategies that we study. Similarly, we must clearly document the implementation strategies that are applied, the factors that influence their selection, and any adaptation of the strategy during the course of implementation and sustainment of the innovation being implemented. By incorporating this type of rigor into our work we will be able to not only advance the science of implementation but also our ability to place evidence-based innovations into the hands of practitioners in a timely and efficient manner.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health
Subtitle of host publication	Translating Science to Practice, Second Edition
Publisher	Oxford University Press
Pages	245-266
Number of pages	22
ISBN (Electronic)	9780190683214
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0015
State	Published - Jan 1 2017

Keywords

Adaptation
Classification
Implementation strategies
Interactive assistance
Stakeholder input

Access to Document

10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0015

Cite this

@inbook{73126ab43e8c4180b84f09e6f85faf9b,

title = "Implementation strategies",

abstract = "As the field of implementation science moves beyond studying barriers to and facilitators of implementation to the comparative effectiveness of different strategies, it is essential that we create a common taxonomy to define the strategies that we study. Similarly, we must clearly document the implementation strategies that are applied, the factors that influence their selection, and any adaptation of the strategy during the course of implementation and sustainment of the innovation being implemented. By incorporating this type of rigor into our work we will be able to not only advance the science of implementation but also our ability to place evidence-based innovations into the hands of practitioners in a timely and efficient manner.",

keywords = "Adaptation, Classification, Implementation strategies, Interactive assistance, Stakeholder input",

author = "Kirchner, \{Joann E.\} and Waltz, \{Thomas J.\} and Powell, \{Byron J.\} and Smith, \{Jeffrey L.\} and Proctor, \{Enola K.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Oxford University Press 2018.",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0015",

language = "English",

pages = "245--266",

booktitle = "Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Implementation strategies

AU - Kirchner, Joann E.

AU - Waltz, Thomas J.

AU - Powell, Byron J.

AU - Smith, Jeffrey L.

AU - Proctor, Enola K.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Oxford University Press 2018.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - As the field of implementation science moves beyond studying barriers to and facilitators of implementation to the comparative effectiveness of different strategies, it is essential that we create a common taxonomy to define the strategies that we study. Similarly, we must clearly document the implementation strategies that are applied, the factors that influence their selection, and any adaptation of the strategy during the course of implementation and sustainment of the innovation being implemented. By incorporating this type of rigor into our work we will be able to not only advance the science of implementation but also our ability to place evidence-based innovations into the hands of practitioners in a timely and efficient manner.

AB - As the field of implementation science moves beyond studying barriers to and facilitators of implementation to the comparative effectiveness of different strategies, it is essential that we create a common taxonomy to define the strategies that we study. Similarly, we must clearly document the implementation strategies that are applied, the factors that influence their selection, and any adaptation of the strategy during the course of implementation and sustainment of the innovation being implemented. By incorporating this type of rigor into our work we will be able to not only advance the science of implementation but also our ability to place evidence-based innovations into the hands of practitioners in a timely and efficient manner.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Classification

KW - Implementation strategies

KW - Interactive assistance

KW - Stakeholder input

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85045265198

U2 - 10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0015

DO - 10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0015

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85045265198

SP - 245

EP - 266

BT - Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

Implementation strategies

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this