Implementation and evaluation of a penalized alternating minimization algorithm for computational DIC microscopy

  • Chrysanthe Preza
  • , Joseph A. O'Sullivan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present the implementation and evaluation of a penalized alternating minimization (AM) method for the computation of a specimen's complex transmittance function (magnitude and phase) from images captured with Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) microscopy. The magnitude of the transmittance function is constrained to be less than 1. The penalty is on the roughness of the complex transmittance function. Without the penalty, we show via simulation that the difference between the true and estimated transmittance function takes values in the null space of the DIC point-spread function, thereby characterizing the ill-posed nature of this inverse problem. The penalty effectively attenuates larger spatial frequencies that are in this null space. The algorithm is implemented on yeast cell images after proper normalization of the measured data. Preliminary results are promising.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of SPIE-IS and T Electronic Imaging - Computational Imaging VIII
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
EventComputational Imaging VIII - San Jose, CA, United States
Duration: Jan 18 2010Jan 19 2010

Publication series

NameProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume7533
ISSN (Print)0277-786X

Conference

ConferenceComputational Imaging VIII
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Jose, CA
Period01/18/1001/19/10

Keywords

  • Alternating minimization algorithm
  • Complex function estimation
  • Computational DIC (Nomarski) microscopy
  • Phase estimation
  • Regularization penalties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation and evaluation of a penalized alternating minimization algorithm for computational DIC microscopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this