Implant and clinical characteristics for pediatric and congenital heart patients in the national cardiovascular data registry implantable cardioverter defibrillator registry

Christopher P. Jordan, Vicki Freedenberg, Yongfei Wang, Jeptha P. Curtis, Marye J. Gleva, Charles I. Berul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: In 2010, the National Cardiovascular Data Registry enhanced pediatric, nonatherosclerotic structural heart disease and congenital heart disease (CHD) data collection. This report characterizes CHD and pediatric patients undergoing implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. Methods and Results: In this article, we report implantable cardioverter defibrillator procedures (April 2010 to December 2012) in the registry for 2 cohorts: (1) all patients with CHD (atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, Ebstein anomaly, transposition of the great vessels, and common ventricle) and (2) patients <21 years. We evaluated indications and characteristics to include transvenous and nontransvenous lead implants, CHD type, and New York Heart Association class. There were 3139 CHD procedures, 1601 for patients <21 years and 126 for CHD <21 years. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator indications for patients with CHD were primary prevention in 1943 (61.9%) and secondary prevention in 1107 (35.2%). Pediatric patients had 935 (58.4%) primary prevention and 588 (36.7%) secondary prevention devices. Primary prevention had higher New York Heart Association class. Nontransvenous age (35.9±23.2 versus 40.1±24.6 years; P=0.05) and nontransvenous height (167.1±18.9 cm; range, 53-193 cm versus 170.4±13.1 cm; range, 61-203 cm; P<0.01) were lower than for transvenous patients. CHD and pediatrics had similar rates of transvenous (97%) and nontransvenous (3%) leads and did not differ from the overall registry. Transposition of the great vessels and common ventricle had higher rates of nontransvenous leads. Conclusions: Primary prevention exceeds secondary prevention for CHD and pediatrics. Nontransvenous lead patients were younger, with higher rates of transposition of the great vessels and common ventricle patients compared with transvenous lead patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1092-1100
Number of pages9
JournalCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Keywords

  • Child
  • Defibrillators, implantable
  • Heart defects, congenital

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Implant and clinical characteristics for pediatric and congenital heart patients in the national cardiovascular data registry implantable cardioverter defibrillator registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this