Impact of Sandimmune, neoral, and prograf on rejection incidence and renal function in primary liver transplant recipients

D. Van Buren, J. Payne, S. Geevarghese, R. MacDonell, W. Chapman, J. K. Wright, J. H. Helderman, R. Richie, C. W. Pinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Following primary liver transplantation, immunosuppression efficacy of Neoral and Prograf was similar and superior to that of Sandimmune. Rejection incidence was statistically increased with Sandimmune therapy. Incidence of hypertension, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, and infectious complications was not statistically different. Although early compromise in renal function was associated with Sandimmune, Neoral and Prograf immunosuppression, no progressive renal dysfunction was identified.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1830-1832
Number of pages3
JournalTransplantation Proceedings
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Sandimmune, neoral, and prograf on rejection incidence and renal function in primary liver transplant recipients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this