TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
T2 - A secondary analysis of the NRG oncology RTOG 0617 randomized clinical trial
AU - Chun, Stephen G.
AU - Hu, Chen
AU - Choy, Hak
AU - Komaki, Ritsuko U.
AU - Timmerman, Robert D.
AU - Schild, Steven E.
AU - Bogart, Jeffrey A.
AU - Dobelbower, Michael C.
AU - Bosch, Walter
AU - Galvin, James M.
AU - Kavadi, Vivek S.
AU - Narayan, Samir
AU - Iyengar, Puneeth
AU - Robinson, Clifford G.
AU - Wynn, Raymond B.
AU - Raben, Adam
AU - Augspurger, Mark E.
AU - MacRae, Robert M.
AU - Paulus, Rebecca
AU - Bradley, Jeffrey D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Purpose: Although intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is increasingly used to treat locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), IMRT and three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT) have not been compared prospectively. This study compares 3D-CRT and IMRT outcomes for locally advanced NSCLC in a large prospective clinical trial. Patients and Methods: A secondary analysis was performed to compare IMRT with 3D-CRT in NRG Oncology clinical trial RTOG 0617, in which patients received concurrent chemotherapy of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without cetuximab, and 60-versus 74-Gy radiation doses. Comparisons included 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, local failure, distant metastasis, and selected Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3) ≥ grade 3 toxicities. Results: The median follow-up was 21.3 months. Of 482 patients, 53% were treated with 3D-CRT and 47% with IMRT. The IMRT group had larger planning treatment volumes (median, 427 v 486 mL; P = .005); a larger planning treatment volume/volume of lung ratio (median, 0.13 v 0.15; P = .013); and more stage IIIB disease (30.3% v 38.6%, P = .056). Two-year OS, progression-free survival, local failure, and distant metastasis-free survival were not different between IMRT and 3D-CRT. IMRT was associated with less $ grade 3 pneumonitis (7.9% v 3.5%, P = .039) and a reduced risk inadjusted analyses (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.171 to 0.986; P = .046). IMRT also produced lower heart doses (P < .05), and the volume of heart receiving 40 Gy (V40) was significantly associated with OS on adjusted analysis (P < .05). The lung V5 was not associated with any ≥ grade 3 toxicity, whereas the lung V20 was associated with increased ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis risk on multivariable analysis (P = .026). Conclusion: IMRT was associated with lower rates of severe pneumonitis and cardiac doses in NRG Oncology clinical trial RTOG 0617, which supports routine use of IMRT for locally advanced NSCLC.
AB - Purpose: Although intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is increasingly used to treat locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), IMRT and three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT) have not been compared prospectively. This study compares 3D-CRT and IMRT outcomes for locally advanced NSCLC in a large prospective clinical trial. Patients and Methods: A secondary analysis was performed to compare IMRT with 3D-CRT in NRG Oncology clinical trial RTOG 0617, in which patients received concurrent chemotherapy of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without cetuximab, and 60-versus 74-Gy radiation doses. Comparisons included 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, local failure, distant metastasis, and selected Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3) ≥ grade 3 toxicities. Results: The median follow-up was 21.3 months. Of 482 patients, 53% were treated with 3D-CRT and 47% with IMRT. The IMRT group had larger planning treatment volumes (median, 427 v 486 mL; P = .005); a larger planning treatment volume/volume of lung ratio (median, 0.13 v 0.15; P = .013); and more stage IIIB disease (30.3% v 38.6%, P = .056). Two-year OS, progression-free survival, local failure, and distant metastasis-free survival were not different between IMRT and 3D-CRT. IMRT was associated with less $ grade 3 pneumonitis (7.9% v 3.5%, P = .039) and a reduced risk inadjusted analyses (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.171 to 0.986; P = .046). IMRT also produced lower heart doses (P < .05), and the volume of heart receiving 40 Gy (V40) was significantly associated with OS on adjusted analysis (P < .05). The lung V5 was not associated with any ≥ grade 3 toxicity, whereas the lung V20 was associated with increased ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis risk on multivariable analysis (P = .026). Conclusion: IMRT was associated with lower rates of severe pneumonitis and cardiac doses in NRG Oncology clinical trial RTOG 0617, which supports routine use of IMRT for locally advanced NSCLC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009788816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.1378
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.1378
M3 - Article
C2 - 28034064
AN - SCOPUS:85009788816
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 35
SP - 56
EP - 62
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 1
ER -