TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of implant metal type and vancomycin prophylaxis on postoperative spine infection
T2 - an in-vivo study
AU - Gupta, Sachin
AU - Maitra, Sukanta
AU - Farooqi, Ali S.
AU - Gupta, Kavita
AU - Wetpiriyakul, Pumibal
AU - Pereira, Maria
AU - Durbin-Johnson, Blythe
AU - Gupta, Munish C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of vancomycin prophylaxis on spinal implant metal types. Methods: 42 rabbits underwent posterior, single-level instrumentation at L5-L6 with stainless steel (n = 18), cobalt chrome (n = 12), or titanium (n = 12) wire. All implants were inoculated with 1 × 106 colony forming units (CFU) of methicillin-resistant S. Aureus (MRSA). In the intrawound vancomycin subgroup (n = 18, 6 from each metal type), 40 mg of vancomycin powder was placed in the wound. In the IV vancomycin subgroup (n = 6, all stainless steel), 15 mg/kg of IV vancomycin was given preoperatively. Local soft tissue and implants were harvested 1-week postoperatively and separately cultured. Results: Intrawound vancomycin significantly reduced the rate of soft tissue infection (44.4% vs 100%) and implant infection (27.8% vs 100%) (p < 0.001). Within the intrawound vancomycin subgroup, cobalt chrome implants were associated with higher median soft tissue MRSA growth (130 CFU) than stainless steel (0 CFU) or titanium (0 CFU) (p = 0.02). Cobalt chrome implants were also more likely to develop soft tissue MRSA infection (83.3%) as compared to stainless steel (16.7%) or titanium (33.3%) (p = 0.04). Median soft tissue MRSA growth among stainless steel implants without prophylaxis, with IV vancomycin, and with vancomycin powder was 1.18 × 107, 195, and 0 CFU, respectively. The rate of soft tissue MRSA infection without prophylaxis, with IV vancomycin, and with vancomycin powder was 100, 66.7, and 16.7%, respectively (p = 0.015). Conclusion: Intrawound vancomycin is more effective than IV vancomycin and effectively reduces the risk of infection, but is less effective in cobalt chrome implants due to residual soft tissue infection.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of vancomycin prophylaxis on spinal implant metal types. Methods: 42 rabbits underwent posterior, single-level instrumentation at L5-L6 with stainless steel (n = 18), cobalt chrome (n = 12), or titanium (n = 12) wire. All implants were inoculated with 1 × 106 colony forming units (CFU) of methicillin-resistant S. Aureus (MRSA). In the intrawound vancomycin subgroup (n = 18, 6 from each metal type), 40 mg of vancomycin powder was placed in the wound. In the IV vancomycin subgroup (n = 6, all stainless steel), 15 mg/kg of IV vancomycin was given preoperatively. Local soft tissue and implants were harvested 1-week postoperatively and separately cultured. Results: Intrawound vancomycin significantly reduced the rate of soft tissue infection (44.4% vs 100%) and implant infection (27.8% vs 100%) (p < 0.001). Within the intrawound vancomycin subgroup, cobalt chrome implants were associated with higher median soft tissue MRSA growth (130 CFU) than stainless steel (0 CFU) or titanium (0 CFU) (p = 0.02). Cobalt chrome implants were also more likely to develop soft tissue MRSA infection (83.3%) as compared to stainless steel (16.7%) or titanium (33.3%) (p = 0.04). Median soft tissue MRSA growth among stainless steel implants without prophylaxis, with IV vancomycin, and with vancomycin powder was 1.18 × 107, 195, and 0 CFU, respectively. The rate of soft tissue MRSA infection without prophylaxis, with IV vancomycin, and with vancomycin powder was 100, 66.7, and 16.7%, respectively (p = 0.015). Conclusion: Intrawound vancomycin is more effective than IV vancomycin and effectively reduces the risk of infection, but is less effective in cobalt chrome implants due to residual soft tissue infection.
KW - Antibiotic
KW - Cobalt
KW - Implant
KW - In vivo
KW - Infection
KW - MRSA
KW - Metal
KW - Stainless steel
KW - Staph
KW - Titanium
KW - Vancomycin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149983133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s43390-023-00674-1
DO - 10.1007/s43390-023-00674-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 36920741
AN - SCOPUS:85149983133
SN - 2212-134X
VL - 11
SP - 815
EP - 823
JO - Spine deformity
JF - Spine deformity
IS - 4
ER -