TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Cost-Sharing Increases on Continuity of Specialty Drug Use
T2 - A Quasi-Experimental Study
AU - Li, Pengxiang
AU - Hu, Tianyan
AU - Yu, Xinyan
AU - Chahin, Salim
AU - Dahodwala, Nabila
AU - Blum, Marissa
AU - Pettit, Amy R.
AU - Doshi, Jalpa A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Health Research and Educational Trust
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Objective: To examine the impact of cost-sharing increases on continuity of specialty drug use in Medicare beneficiaries with multiple sclerosis (MS) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Data Sources/Study Setting: Five percent Medicare claims data (2007–2010). Study Design: Quasi-experimental study examining changes in specialty drug use among a group of Medicare Part D beneficiaries without low-income subsidies (non-LIS) as they transitioned from a 5 percent cost-sharing preperiod to a ≥25 percent cost-sharing postperiod, as compared to changes among a disease-matched contemporaneous control group of patients eligible for full low-income subsidies (LIS), who faced minor cost sharing (≤$6.30 copayment) in both the pre- and postperiods. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Key variables were extracted from Medicare data. Principal Findings: Relative to the LIS group, the non-LIS group had a greater increase in incidence of 30-day continuous gaps in any Part D treatment from the lower cost-sharing period to the higher cost-sharing period (MS, absolute increase = 10.1 percent, OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.19–2.17; RA, absolute increase = 21.9 percent, OR = 2.75, 95% CI 2.15–3.51). The increase in Part D treatment gaps was not offset by increased Part B specialty drug use. Conclusions: Cost-sharing increases due to specialty tier-level cost sharing were associated with interruptions in MS and RA specialty drug treatments.
AB - Objective: To examine the impact of cost-sharing increases on continuity of specialty drug use in Medicare beneficiaries with multiple sclerosis (MS) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Data Sources/Study Setting: Five percent Medicare claims data (2007–2010). Study Design: Quasi-experimental study examining changes in specialty drug use among a group of Medicare Part D beneficiaries without low-income subsidies (non-LIS) as they transitioned from a 5 percent cost-sharing preperiod to a ≥25 percent cost-sharing postperiod, as compared to changes among a disease-matched contemporaneous control group of patients eligible for full low-income subsidies (LIS), who faced minor cost sharing (≤$6.30 copayment) in both the pre- and postperiods. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Key variables were extracted from Medicare data. Principal Findings: Relative to the LIS group, the non-LIS group had a greater increase in incidence of 30-day continuous gaps in any Part D treatment from the lower cost-sharing period to the higher cost-sharing period (MS, absolute increase = 10.1 percent, OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.19–2.17; RA, absolute increase = 21.9 percent, OR = 2.75, 95% CI 2.15–3.51). The increase in Part D treatment gaps was not offset by increased Part B specialty drug use. Conclusions: Cost-sharing increases due to specialty tier-level cost sharing were associated with interruptions in MS and RA specialty drug treatments.
KW - Medicare
KW - chronic illness
KW - observational data/quasi-experiments
KW - pharmaceuticals: prescribing/use/costs
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85050387409
U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.12744
DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.12744
M3 - Article
C2 - 28736929
AN - SCOPUS:85050387409
SN - 0017-9124
VL - 53
SP - 2735
EP - 2757
JO - Health services research
JF - Health services research
ER -