TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaging traumatic facial nerve injuries
T2 - a narrative review of current strategies and future directions for cranial nerve imaging
AU - Datta, Néha
AU - Fung, Ethan
AU - Hatala, Adam
AU - Melnyk, Brooks
AU - Bradley, Erika
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Traumatic facial nerve injuries can result in temporary or permanent loss of function. Restoration of facial expression may occur spontaneously or require surgical intervention. Although thorough examination and history can localize the site of facial nerve damage, it can be difficult to predict if and when recovery will occur. This is salient because the window for optimal outcomes from surgical re-neurotization can be as short as 1 to 2 years, after which functional loss may be irreversible. It is essential to offer patients the most appropriate treatment plan based on prognosis, and imaging plays an essential role in localizing the site and morphology of nerve injury. Multiple imaging modalities have been used to evaluate the facial nerve, including computed tomography (CT) and, more recently, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US). CT and MRI are more commonly implemented; however, Diffusion tensor tractography, high-resolution US, and functional US are gaining traction for studying cranial nerve pathology. Until recently, the morphology of facial nerve and other cranial nerve injuries could only be inferred using non-invasive diagnostic techniques. With the advent of newer imaging technologies and techniques to examine nerves, more refined assessment and prognostic information is now possible. This article reviews up-to-date cranial nerve imaging techniques from the last ten years and explores future avenues for facial nerve imaging.
AB - Traumatic facial nerve injuries can result in temporary or permanent loss of function. Restoration of facial expression may occur spontaneously or require surgical intervention. Although thorough examination and history can localize the site of facial nerve damage, it can be difficult to predict if and when recovery will occur. This is salient because the window for optimal outcomes from surgical re-neurotization can be as short as 1 to 2 years, after which functional loss may be irreversible. It is essential to offer patients the most appropriate treatment plan based on prognosis, and imaging plays an essential role in localizing the site and morphology of nerve injury. Multiple imaging modalities have been used to evaluate the facial nerve, including computed tomography (CT) and, more recently, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US). CT and MRI are more commonly implemented; however, Diffusion tensor tractography, high-resolution US, and functional US are gaining traction for studying cranial nerve pathology. Until recently, the morphology of facial nerve and other cranial nerve injuries could only be inferred using non-invasive diagnostic techniques. With the advent of newer imaging technologies and techniques to examine nerves, more refined assessment and prognostic information is now possible. This article reviews up-to-date cranial nerve imaging techniques from the last ten years and explores future avenues for facial nerve imaging.
KW - Facial nerve
KW - cranial nerve
KW - facial palsy
KW - high-resolution imaging
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - peripheral nerve
KW - trauma
KW - ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173634253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20517/2347-9264.2023.22
DO - 10.20517/2347-9264.2023.22
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85173634253
SN - 2347-9264
VL - 10
JO - Plastic and Aesthetic Research
JF - Plastic and Aesthetic Research
M1 - e94
ER -