TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaging modalities for measuring body composition in patients with cancer
T2 - opportunities and challenges
AU - Shah, Urvi A.
AU - Ballinger, Tarah J.
AU - Bhandari, Rusha
AU - Dieli-Cornwright, Christina M.
AU - Guertin, Kristin A.
AU - Hibler, Elizabeth A.
AU - Kalam, Faiza
AU - Lohmann, Ana Elisa
AU - Ippolito, Joseph E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected].
PY - 2023/5/4
Y1 - 2023/5/4
N2 - Body composition assessment (ie, the measurement of muscle and adiposity) impacts several cancer-related outcomes including treatment-related toxicities, treatment responses, complications, and prognosis. Traditional modalities for body composition measurement include body mass index, body circumference, skinfold thickness, and bioelectrical impedance analysis; advanced imaging modalities include dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages, thus requiring an individualized approach in identifying the most appropriate measure for specific clinical or research situations. Advancements in imaging approaches have led to an abundance of available data, however, the lack of standardized thresholds for classification of abnormal muscle mass or adiposity has been a barrier to adopting these measurements widely in research and clinical care. In this review, we discuss the different modalities in detail and provide guidance on their unique opportunities and challenges.
AB - Body composition assessment (ie, the measurement of muscle and adiposity) impacts several cancer-related outcomes including treatment-related toxicities, treatment responses, complications, and prognosis. Traditional modalities for body composition measurement include body mass index, body circumference, skinfold thickness, and bioelectrical impedance analysis; advanced imaging modalities include dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages, thus requiring an individualized approach in identifying the most appropriate measure for specific clinical or research situations. Advancements in imaging approaches have led to an abundance of available data, however, the lack of standardized thresholds for classification of abnormal muscle mass or adiposity has been a barrier to adopting these measurements widely in research and clinical care. In this review, we discuss the different modalities in detail and provide guidance on their unique opportunities and challenges.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159544798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad001
DO - 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37139984
AN - SCOPUS:85159544798
SN - 1052-6773
VL - 2023
SP - 56
EP - 67
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs
IS - 61
ER -