TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying the impact of intimate partner violence in humanitarian settings
T2 - Using an ecological framework to review 15 years of evidence
AU - Meinhart, Melissa
AU - Seff, Ilana
AU - Troy, Katrina
AU - McNelly, Samantha
AU - Vahedi, Luissa
AU - Poulton, Catherine
AU - Stark, Lindsay
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzer-.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive form of gender-based violence that exacer-bates in humanitarian settings. This systematic review examined the myriad IPV impacts and the quality of existing evidence of IPV in humanitarian settings. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) procedures, a total of 51 articles were included from the 3924 screened. We identified the impact of IPV across two levels of the ecological framework: individual and microsystem. Our findings corroborated previous evidence that indi-cated IPV to be associated with adverse physical and mental health for survivors. Our findings also uniquely synthesized the intergenerational impact of IPV in humanitarian settings. However, findings highlighted a glaring gap in evidence examining the non-health impact of IPV for survivors in humanitarian settings and across levels of the ecological framework. Without enhanced research of women and girls and the violence they experience, humanitarian responses will continue to under-achieve, and the needs of women and girls will continue to be relegated as secondary interests. Investment should prioritize addressing the range of both health and non-health impacts of IPV among individuals, families, and communities, as well as consider how the humanitarian environment influences these linkages.
AB - Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive form of gender-based violence that exacer-bates in humanitarian settings. This systematic review examined the myriad IPV impacts and the quality of existing evidence of IPV in humanitarian settings. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) procedures, a total of 51 articles were included from the 3924 screened. We identified the impact of IPV across two levels of the ecological framework: individual and microsystem. Our findings corroborated previous evidence that indi-cated IPV to be associated with adverse physical and mental health for survivors. Our findings also uniquely synthesized the intergenerational impact of IPV in humanitarian settings. However, findings highlighted a glaring gap in evidence examining the non-health impact of IPV for survivors in humanitarian settings and across levels of the ecological framework. Without enhanced research of women and girls and the violence they experience, humanitarian responses will continue to under-achieve, and the needs of women and girls will continue to be relegated as secondary interests. Investment should prioritize addressing the range of both health and non-health impacts of IPV among individuals, families, and communities, as well as consider how the humanitarian environment influences these linkages.
KW - Ecological frameworks
KW - Gender-based violence
KW - Humanitarian settings
KW - Intimate partner violence
KW - Systematic review
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85108829937
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph18136963
DO - 10.3390/ijerph18136963
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34209746
AN - SCOPUS:85108829937
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 18
JO - International journal of environmental research and public health
JF - International journal of environmental research and public health
IS - 13
M1 - 6963
ER -