TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of Process Measures to Reduce Postoperative Readmission
AU - Halverson, Amy L.
AU - Sellers, Morgan M.
AU - Bilimoria, Karl Y.
AU - Hawn, Mary T.
AU - Williams, Mark V.
AU - McLeod, Robin S.
AU - Ko, Clifford Y.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This study was supported by funding from the Nora Institute for Surgical Patient Safety.
PY - 2014/8
Y1 - 2014/8
N2 - Background: Readmission rates after intestinal surgery have been notably high, ranging from 10 % for elective surgery to 21 % for urgent/emergent surgery. Other than adherence to established strategies for decreasing individual postoperative complications, there is little guidance available for providers to work toward reducing their postoperative readmission rates. Study Design: Processes of care that may affect postoperative readmissions were identified through a systematic literature review, assessment of existing guidelines, and semi-structured interviews with individuals who have expertise in hospital readmissions and surgical quality improvement. Eleven experts ranked potential process measures for validity on the basis of the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Methodology. Results: Of 49 proposed process measures, 34 (69 %) were rated as valid. Of the 34 valid measures, two measures addressed care in the preoperative period. These included evaluation of patient's comorbidities, providing written instruction detailing the anticipated perioperative course, and communication with the patient's referring or primary care doctor. A measure addressing perioperative care stated that institutions should have a standardized perioperative care protocol. Additional measures focused on discharge instructions and communication. Conclusions: An expert panel identified several aspects of care that are considered essential to quality patient care and important to reducing postoperative readmissions.
AB - Background: Readmission rates after intestinal surgery have been notably high, ranging from 10 % for elective surgery to 21 % for urgent/emergent surgery. Other than adherence to established strategies for decreasing individual postoperative complications, there is little guidance available for providers to work toward reducing their postoperative readmission rates. Study Design: Processes of care that may affect postoperative readmissions were identified through a systematic literature review, assessment of existing guidelines, and semi-structured interviews with individuals who have expertise in hospital readmissions and surgical quality improvement. Eleven experts ranked potential process measures for validity on the basis of the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Methodology. Results: Of 49 proposed process measures, 34 (69 %) were rated as valid. Of the 34 valid measures, two measures addressed care in the preoperative period. These included evaluation of patient's comorbidities, providing written instruction detailing the anticipated perioperative course, and communication with the patient's referring or primary care doctor. A measure addressing perioperative care stated that institutions should have a standardized perioperative care protocol. Additional measures focused on discharge instructions and communication. Conclusions: An expert panel identified several aspects of care that are considered essential to quality patient care and important to reducing postoperative readmissions.
KW - Discharge planning
KW - Hospital readmission
KW - Patient communication
KW - Postoperative complication
KW - Preoperative assessment
KW - Process measures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904247459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11605-013-2429-5
DO - 10.1007/s11605-013-2429-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 24912913
AN - SCOPUS:84904247459
SN - 1091-255X
VL - 18
SP - 1407
EP - 1415
JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
IS - 8
ER -