TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of Achalasia Within Absent Contractility Phenotypes on High-Resolution Manometry
T2 - Prevalence, Predictive Factors, and Treatment Outcome
AU - Patel, Parth
AU - Rogers, Benjamin D.
AU - Rengarajan, Arvind
AU - Elsbernd, Benjamin
AU - O’Brien, Elizabeth R.
AU - Gyawali, C. Prakash
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Absent contractility on high-resolution manometry (HRM) defines severe hypomotility but needs distinction from achalasia. We retrospectively identified achalasia within absent contractility using HRM provocative maneuvers, barium esophagography, and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP). METHODS: Adult patients with absent contractility on HRM during the 4-year study period were eligible for inclusion. Inadequate studies, achalasia after therapy, or prior foregut surgery were exclusions. Upright integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) >12 mm Hg, panesophageal pressurization, and/or elevated IRP on multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge (RDC) were considered abnormal. Esophageal barium retention and abnormal esophagogastric junction distensibility index (<2.0 mm2/mm Hg) on FLIP defined achalasia. Clinical, endoscopic, and motor characteristics of patients with achalasia were compared with absent contractility without obstruction. RESULTS: Of 164 patients, 20 (12.2%) had achalasia (17.9% of 112 patients with adjunctive testing), while 92 did not, and 52 did not undergo adjunctive tests. Achalasia was diagnosed regardless of IRP value, but the median supine IRP was higher (odds ratio 1.196, 95% confidence interval 1.041–1.375, P 5 0.012). Patients with achalasia were more likely to present with dysphagia (80.0% vs 35.9%, P < 0.001), with obstructive features on HRM maneuvers (83.3% vs 48.9%, P 5 0.039), but lower likelihood of GERD evidence (20.0% vs 47.3%, P 5 0.027) or large hiatus hernia (15.0% vs 43.8%, P 5 0.002). On multivariable analysis, dysphagia presentation (P 5 0.006) and pressurization on RDC (P 5 0.027) predicted achalasia, while reflux and presurgical evaluations and lack of RDC obstruction predicted absent contractility without obstruction. DISCUSSION: Despite HRM diagnosis of absent contractility, achalasia is identified in more than 1 in 10 patients regardless of IRP value.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Absent contractility on high-resolution manometry (HRM) defines severe hypomotility but needs distinction from achalasia. We retrospectively identified achalasia within absent contractility using HRM provocative maneuvers, barium esophagography, and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP). METHODS: Adult patients with absent contractility on HRM during the 4-year study period were eligible for inclusion. Inadequate studies, achalasia after therapy, or prior foregut surgery were exclusions. Upright integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) >12 mm Hg, panesophageal pressurization, and/or elevated IRP on multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge (RDC) were considered abnormal. Esophageal barium retention and abnormal esophagogastric junction distensibility index (<2.0 mm2/mm Hg) on FLIP defined achalasia. Clinical, endoscopic, and motor characteristics of patients with achalasia were compared with absent contractility without obstruction. RESULTS: Of 164 patients, 20 (12.2%) had achalasia (17.9% of 112 patients with adjunctive testing), while 92 did not, and 52 did not undergo adjunctive tests. Achalasia was diagnosed regardless of IRP value, but the median supine IRP was higher (odds ratio 1.196, 95% confidence interval 1.041–1.375, P 5 0.012). Patients with achalasia were more likely to present with dysphagia (80.0% vs 35.9%, P < 0.001), with obstructive features on HRM maneuvers (83.3% vs 48.9%, P 5 0.039), but lower likelihood of GERD evidence (20.0% vs 47.3%, P 5 0.027) or large hiatus hernia (15.0% vs 43.8%, P 5 0.002). On multivariable analysis, dysphagia presentation (P 5 0.006) and pressurization on RDC (P 5 0.027) predicted achalasia, while reflux and presurgical evaluations and lack of RDC obstruction predicted absent contractility without obstruction. DISCUSSION: Despite HRM diagnosis of absent contractility, achalasia is identified in more than 1 in 10 patients regardless of IRP value.
KW - absent contractility
KW - achalasia
KW - high-resolution manometry
KW - integrated relaxation pressure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208492052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002694
DO - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002694
M3 - Article
C2 - 38299616
AN - SCOPUS:85208492052
SN - 0002-9270
VL - 119
SP - 2189
EP - 2197
JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 11
ER -