TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of a major I-Ek-restricted determinant of hen egg lysozyme
T2 - Limitations of lymph node proliferation studies in defining immunodominance and crypticity
AU - Viner, Nicholas J.
AU - Nelson, Christopher A.
AU - Unanue, Emil R.
PY - 1995/3/14
Y1 - 1995/3/14
N2 - We have chemically analyzed the peptides presented by I-Ek molecules after processing of hen egg lysozyme (HEL) by a murine B-lymphoma line or by splenocytes. In both cases, the identified peptides were derived from a single region of HEL, containing the core residues 85-96 with heterogeneous N and C termini. This was a surprising result because this determinant had previously been described as cryptic - i.e., not presented after processing of intact HEL. Examination of the specificities of T hybridomas isolated after immunization with either HEL or 84-96 peptide (p84-96) provided an explanation for this controversy. Whereas hybridomas induced by immunization with HEL responded equally well to HEL and p84-96, those induced by peptide immunization showed a marked preference for p84-96 over intact HEL. In other words, hybridomas isolated after p84-96 immunization responded poorly to forms of the 84-96 determinant produced by natural processing, leading to the possible erroneous interpretation that 84-96 is a hidden determinant. We conclude that (i) p84-96 is efficiently presented on I-Ek molecules after processing of HEL, (ii) the explanation for the weak lymph node response to this epitope after immunization with HEL lies at the level of the T cell, not the antigen-presenting cell, and (iii) crypticity cannot be defined on the basis of T-cell proliferation studies alone.
AB - We have chemically analyzed the peptides presented by I-Ek molecules after processing of hen egg lysozyme (HEL) by a murine B-lymphoma line or by splenocytes. In both cases, the identified peptides were derived from a single region of HEL, containing the core residues 85-96 with heterogeneous N and C termini. This was a surprising result because this determinant had previously been described as cryptic - i.e., not presented after processing of intact HEL. Examination of the specificities of T hybridomas isolated after immunization with either HEL or 84-96 peptide (p84-96) provided an explanation for this controversy. Whereas hybridomas induced by immunization with HEL responded equally well to HEL and p84-96, those induced by peptide immunization showed a marked preference for p84-96 over intact HEL. In other words, hybridomas isolated after p84-96 immunization responded poorly to forms of the 84-96 determinant produced by natural processing, leading to the possible erroneous interpretation that 84-96 is a hidden determinant. We conclude that (i) p84-96 is efficiently presented on I-Ek molecules after processing of HEL, (ii) the explanation for the weak lymph node response to this epitope after immunization with HEL lies at the level of the T cell, not the antigen-presenting cell, and (iii) crypticity cannot be defined on the basis of T-cell proliferation studies alone.
KW - Antigen processing
KW - Major histocompatibility complex
KW - Peptide immunization
KW - Peptide sequencing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028986855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.92.6.2214
DO - 10.1073/pnas.92.6.2214
M3 - Article
C2 - 7534415
AN - SCOPUS:0028986855
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 92
SP - 2214
EP - 2218
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 6
ER -