TY - JOUR
T1 - “I don't believe it.” Acceptance and skepticism of genetic health information among African-American and White smokers
AU - Waters, Erika A.
AU - Ball, Linda
AU - Gehlert, Sarah
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant from the American Cancer Society (ACS) to Erika Waters (MRSG-11-214-01-CPPB) and by the Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences grant UL1TR000448 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH or ACS.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Rationale Effective translation of genomics research into practice depends on public acceptance of genomics-related health information. Objective To explore how smokers come to accept or reject information about the relationship between genetics and nicotine addiction. Methods Thirteen focus groups (N = 84) were stratified by education (seven < Bachelor's degree, six ≥ Bachelor's degree) and race (eight black, five white). Participants viewed a 1-min video describing the discovery of a genetic variant associated with increased risk of nicotine addiction and lung cancer. Next, they provided their opinions about the information. Two coders analyzed the data using grounded theory. Results Pre-video knowledge about why people smoke cigarettes and what genetic risk means informed beliefs about the relationship between genes and addiction. These beliefs were not always consistent with biomedical explanations, but formed the context through which participants processed the video's information. This, in turn, led to information acceptance or skepticism. Participants explained their reactions in terms of the scientific merits of the research and used their existing knowledge and beliefs to explain their acceptance of or skepticism about the information. Conclusion Laypeople hold complex understandings of genetics and addiction. However, when lay and biomedical explanations diverge, genetics-related health information may be rejected.
AB - Rationale Effective translation of genomics research into practice depends on public acceptance of genomics-related health information. Objective To explore how smokers come to accept or reject information about the relationship between genetics and nicotine addiction. Methods Thirteen focus groups (N = 84) were stratified by education (seven < Bachelor's degree, six ≥ Bachelor's degree) and race (eight black, five white). Participants viewed a 1-min video describing the discovery of a genetic variant associated with increased risk of nicotine addiction and lung cancer. Next, they provided their opinions about the information. Two coders analyzed the data using grounded theory. Results Pre-video knowledge about why people smoke cigarettes and what genetic risk means informed beliefs about the relationship between genes and addiction. These beliefs were not always consistent with biomedical explanations, but formed the context through which participants processed the video's information. This, in turn, led to information acceptance or skepticism. Participants explained their reactions in terms of the scientific merits of the research and used their existing knowledge and beliefs to explain their acceptance of or skepticism about the information. Conclusion Laypeople hold complex understandings of genetics and addiction. However, when lay and biomedical explanations diverge, genetics-related health information may be rejected.
KW - Gene-environment interaction
KW - Health communication
KW - Information processing
KW - Message rejection
KW - Tobacco use
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019448642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.053
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.053
M3 - Article
C2 - 28527373
AN - SCOPUS:85019448642
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 184
SP - 153
EP - 160
JO - Social Science and Medicine
JF - Social Science and Medicine
ER -