TY - JOUR
T1 - Hydrophobic interactions of brush border alkaline phosphatases
T2 - The role of phosphatidyl inositol
AU - Seetharam, Bellur
AU - Tiruppathi, Chinnaswamy
AU - Alpers, David H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AM 26638. We thank Ms. Joyce Rudolph for her excellent help in the preparation of this manuscript.
PY - 1987/2/15
Y1 - 1987/2/15
N2 - Tissue-specific (intestinal) and tissue-nonspecific (kidney) rat alkaline phosphatases are released from their respective brush border membranes by different enzymes. To elucidate the mechanism underlying their membrane attachment, we tested the ability of these enzymes to partition into lipid or aqueous phases both before and after treatment with phospholipases and proteases. Interaction with Triton X-114 micelles was eliminated or decreased by treatment of intestinal enzyme with phospholipase A2 or papain, while only phosphatidylinositol (PI)-specific phospholipase C (PIPLC) and subtilisin were effective with the kidney enzyme. Binding to octyl Sepharose for the intestinal enzyme was decreased by phospholipase A2 more than by PIPLC, whereas the reverse was true for the kidney enzyme. Treatment with phospholipases decreased the apparent mass of the phosphatases by 50-80 kDa, presumably due to loss of bound lipid and detergent. PIPLC treatment of the kidney, but not the intestinal enzyme, prevented binding of the phosphatase to phospholipid vesicles. These results show that both enzymes are bound to respective membranes by hydrophobic anchor peptides to which phospholipids are bound. However, their sensitivity to phospholipases is different. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that, in the kidney enzyme, the PI is bound covalently, while with the intestinal enzyme, binding of PI appears to be tight but not covalent.
AB - Tissue-specific (intestinal) and tissue-nonspecific (kidney) rat alkaline phosphatases are released from their respective brush border membranes by different enzymes. To elucidate the mechanism underlying their membrane attachment, we tested the ability of these enzymes to partition into lipid or aqueous phases both before and after treatment with phospholipases and proteases. Interaction with Triton X-114 micelles was eliminated or decreased by treatment of intestinal enzyme with phospholipase A2 or papain, while only phosphatidylinositol (PI)-specific phospholipase C (PIPLC) and subtilisin were effective with the kidney enzyme. Binding to octyl Sepharose for the intestinal enzyme was decreased by phospholipase A2 more than by PIPLC, whereas the reverse was true for the kidney enzyme. Treatment with phospholipases decreased the apparent mass of the phosphatases by 50-80 kDa, presumably due to loss of bound lipid and detergent. PIPLC treatment of the kidney, but not the intestinal enzyme, prevented binding of the phosphatase to phospholipid vesicles. These results show that both enzymes are bound to respective membranes by hydrophobic anchor peptides to which phospholipids are bound. However, their sensitivity to phospholipases is different. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that, in the kidney enzyme, the PI is bound covalently, while with the intestinal enzyme, binding of PI appears to be tight but not covalent.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023131116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0003-9861(87)90651-5
DO - 10.1016/0003-9861(87)90651-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 3813562
AN - SCOPUS:0023131116
SN - 0003-9861
VL - 253
SP - 189
EP - 198
JO - Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
JF - Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
IS - 1
ER -