TY - GEN
T1 - Hybrid transition mechanism for MILSA architecture for the next generation internet
AU - Pan, Jianli
AU - Paul, Subharthi
AU - Jain, Raj
AU - Xu, Xiaohu
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - MILSA (Mobility and Multihoming supporting Identifier Locator Split Architecture) [1, 2] is a new architecture to address the naming, addressing, and routing challenges in the current Internet. It separates the identifier (ID) from locator, separates control from data delivery, and provides comprehensive benefits in routing scalability, mobility and multihoming, traffic engineering, renumbering, and policy enforcements. Currently there is an on-going debate in IRTF (Internet Research Task Force) RRG (Routing Research Group) on several possible evolutional directions. Two typical directions are "core-edge separation" (called "Strategy A" [3]) and "ID locator split" (called "Strategy B") respectively. To address this issue, based on our previous work, in this paper, we present a hybrid transition and deployment mechanism to allow the two strategies to coexist and allow the architecture to evolve to any of the two directions and allow the market to decide the course of the evolution based on technical superiority, business friendliness, ease of deployability and other such factors over the long run. Further, the description of various scenarios and technical analysis show the potential benefits of this hybrid transition and deployment design in supporting long-term evolution and incremental deployability that are important for the Next Generation Internet architecture.
AB - MILSA (Mobility and Multihoming supporting Identifier Locator Split Architecture) [1, 2] is a new architecture to address the naming, addressing, and routing challenges in the current Internet. It separates the identifier (ID) from locator, separates control from data delivery, and provides comprehensive benefits in routing scalability, mobility and multihoming, traffic engineering, renumbering, and policy enforcements. Currently there is an on-going debate in IRTF (Internet Research Task Force) RRG (Routing Research Group) on several possible evolutional directions. Two typical directions are "core-edge separation" (called "Strategy A" [3]) and "ID locator split" (called "Strategy B") respectively. To address this issue, based on our previous work, in this paper, we present a hybrid transition and deployment mechanism to allow the two strategies to coexist and allow the architecture to evolve to any of the two directions and allow the market to decide the course of the evolution based on technical superiority, business friendliness, ease of deployability and other such factors over the long run. Further, the description of various scenarios and technical analysis show the potential benefits of this hybrid transition and deployment design in supporting long-term evolution and incremental deployability that are important for the Next Generation Internet architecture.
KW - Addressing
KW - Clean slate architecture
KW - Future networks
KW - Identifier-locator split
KW - MILSA
KW - Mobility
KW - Multihoming
KW - Naming
KW - Next generation internet
KW - Routing scalability
KW - Transition
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77951156341
U2 - 10.1109/GLOCOMW.2009.5360743
DO - 10.1109/GLOCOMW.2009.5360743
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:77951156341
SN - 9781424456260
T3 - 2009 IEEE Globecom Workshops, Gc Workshops 2009
BT - 2009 IEEE Globecom Workshops, Gc Workshops 2009
T2 - 2009 IEEE Globecom Workshops, Gc Workshops 2009
Y2 - 30 November 2009 through 4 December 2009
ER -