HuR Function and Translational State Analysis Following Global Brain Ischemia and Reperfusion

Jeffrey J. Szymanski, Haihui Wang, Jill T. Jamison, Donald J. DeGracia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Prolonged translation arrest in post-ischemic hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons precludes translation of induced stress genes and directly correlates with cell death. We evaluated the regulation of mRNAs containing adenine- and uridine-rich elements (ARE) by assessing HuR protein and hsp70 mRNA nuclear translocation, HuR polysome binding, and translation state analysis of CA1 and CA3 at 8 h of reperfusion after 10 min of global cerebral ischemia. There was no difference between CA1 and CA3 at 8 h of reperfusion in nuclear or cytoplasmic HuR protein or hsp70 mRNA, or HuR polysome association, suggesting that neither mechanism contributed to post-ischemic outcome. Translation state analysis revealed that 28 and 58 % of unique mRNAs significantly different between 8hR and NIC, in CA3 and CA1, respectively, were not polysome-bound. There was significantly greater diversity of polysome-bound mRNAs in reperfused CA3 compared to CA1, and in both regions, ARE-containing mRNAs accounted for 4-5 % of the total. These data indicate that posttranscriptional ARE-containing mRNA regulation occurs in reperfused neurons and contributes to post-ischemic outcome. Understanding the differential responses of vulnerable and resistant neurons to ischemia will contribute to the development of effective neuroprotective therapies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)589-603
Number of pages15
JournalTranslational Stroke Research
Volume4
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Keywords

  • CA1
  • CA3
  • Global cerebral ischemia
  • HSP70
  • HuR
  • Microarray
  • Stress responses
  • Translation state analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HuR Function and Translational State Analysis Following Global Brain Ischemia and Reperfusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this