TY - JOUR
T1 - Human perception of electrical stimulation on the surface of somatosensory cortex
AU - Hiremath, Shivayogi V.
AU - Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth C.
AU - Wheeler, Jesse J.
AU - Moran, Daniel W.
AU - Gaunt, Robert A.
AU - Collinger, Jennifer L.
AU - Foldes, Stephen T.
AU - Weber, Douglas J.
AU - Chen, Weidong
AU - Boninger, Michael L.
AU - Wang, Wei
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to first thank our study participant for the invaluable dedication and effort that made this study possible. We would like to thank Dr. Daniel S. Rizzuto from the University of Pennsylvania for sharing his experience with using Blackrock Stimulator for their research. We would like to thank Dr. Donald Crammond for intra-operative brain mapping and electrode impedance testing. We would also like to thank Ms. Debbie Harrington, our clinical research coordinator, for her great effort in participant recruitment, clinical data management, and study coordination. This work was supported by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), UPMC Rehabilitation Institute, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Grants 3R01NS050256-05S1 and 8KL2TR000146), and Paralyzed Veterans of America Research Foundation (PVA#3039). The funders had no role in the preparation of this article.
PY - 2017/5
Y1 - 2017/5
N2 - Recent advancement in electrocorticography (ECoG)-based brain-computer interface technology has sparked a new interest in providing somatosensory feedback using ECoG electrodes, i.e., cortical surface electrodes. We conducted a 28-day study of cortical surface stimulation in an individual with arm paralysis due to brachial plexus injury to examine the sensation produced by electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex. A high-density ECoG grid was implanted over the somatosensory and motor cortices. Stimulation through cortical surface electrodes over the somatosensory cortex successfully elicited arm and hand sensations in our participant with chronic paralysis. There were three key findings. First, the intensity of perceived sensation increased monotonically with both pulse amplitude and pulse frequency. Second, changing pulse width changed the type of sensation based on qualitative description provided by the human participant. Third, the participant could distinguish between stimulation applied to two neighboring cortical surface electrodes, 4.5 mm center-to-center distance, for three out of seven electrode pairs tested. Taken together, we found that it was possible to modulate sensation intensity, sensation type, and evoke sensations across a range of locations from the fingers to the upper arm using different stimulation electrodes even in an individual with chronic impairment of somatosensory function. These three features are essential to provide effective somatosensory feedback for neuroprosthetic applications.
AB - Recent advancement in electrocorticography (ECoG)-based brain-computer interface technology has sparked a new interest in providing somatosensory feedback using ECoG electrodes, i.e., cortical surface electrodes. We conducted a 28-day study of cortical surface stimulation in an individual with arm paralysis due to brachial plexus injury to examine the sensation produced by electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex. A high-density ECoG grid was implanted over the somatosensory and motor cortices. Stimulation through cortical surface electrodes over the somatosensory cortex successfully elicited arm and hand sensations in our participant with chronic paralysis. There were three key findings. First, the intensity of perceived sensation increased monotonically with both pulse amplitude and pulse frequency. Second, changing pulse width changed the type of sensation based on qualitative description provided by the human participant. Third, the participant could distinguish between stimulation applied to two neighboring cortical surface electrodes, 4.5 mm center-to-center distance, for three out of seven electrode pairs tested. Taken together, we found that it was possible to modulate sensation intensity, sensation type, and evoke sensations across a range of locations from the fingers to the upper arm using different stimulation electrodes even in an individual with chronic impairment of somatosensory function. These three features are essential to provide effective somatosensory feedback for neuroprosthetic applications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019055508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0176020
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0176020
M3 - Article
C2 - 28489913
AN - SCOPUS:85019055508
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 12
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 5
M1 - e0176020
ER -