How Personal Motivations Affect Judges’ Decisions

  • Lee Epstein
  • , Jack Knight

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Neither legal academics nor social scientists analyse judging solely through the ‘law versus politics’ dichotomy. They have instead expanded their theoretical toolkit to include four other approaches to judging, in addition to standard legalistic (law) and attitudinal (politics) accounts (all of which are covered in this Handbook). Here we focus on the labour market model, which emphasizes personal motivations for judicial choice, especially (i) job satisfaction, (ii) external satisfactions, (iii) leisure, (iv) salary, and (v) promotion. This chapter provides a brief introduction to the labour market model, with emphasis on the importance of the five key personal motivations. It then considers the motivations separately. For each of the key motivations, the chapter identifies the relevant literature and offers proposals for new research.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behaviour
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages199-222
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9780191924835
ISBN (Print)9780192898579
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

Keywords

  • Collegiality
  • Internal satisfaction
  • Labour market model
  • Leisure
  • Personal motivations
  • Promotion
  • Salary

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Personal Motivations Affect Judges’ Decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this