TY - JOUR
T1 - How members of the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility and Society of Reproductive Surgeons evaluate, define, and manage hydrosalpinges
AU - Omurtag, Kenan
AU - Grindler, Natalia M.
AU - Roehl, Kimberly A.
AU - Bates, Gordon Wright
AU - Beltsos, Angeline N.
AU - Odem, Randall R.
AU - Jungheim, Emily S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by grants 5T32HD040135-10 (K.O.) and K12HD063086 (E.S.J.) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) , Bethesda, Maryland. The contents of this work are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Objective: To describe the management of hydrosalpinges among Society for Reproduction Endocrinology and Infertility (SREI)/Society of Reproductive Surgeons (SRS) members. Design: Cross-sectional survey of SREI/SRS members. Setting: Academic and private practice-based reproductive medicine physicians. Participant(s): A total of 442 SREI and/or SRS members. Intervention(s): Internet-based survey. Main Outcome Measure(s): To understand how respondents evaluate, define, and manage hydrosalpinges. Result(s): Of 1,070 SREI and SRS members surveyed, 442 responded to all items, for a 41% response rate. Respondents represented both academic and private practice settings, and differences existed in the evaluation and management of hydrosalpinges. More than one-half (57%) perform their own hysterosalpingograms (HSGs), and 54.5% involve radiologists in their interpretation of tubal disease. Most respondents thought that a clinically significant hydrosalpinx on HSG is one that is distally occluded (80.4%) or visible on ultrasound (60%). Approximately one in four respondents remove a unilateral hydrosalpinx before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)/intrauterine insemination (IUI) and clomiphene citrate (CC)/IUI (29.3% and 22.8%, respectively), and physicians in private practice were more likely to intervene (COH: risk ratio [RR] 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.51; CC: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.33-2.95). Although laparoscopic salpingectomy was the preferred method of surgical management, nearly one-half responded that hysteroscopic tubal occlusion should have a role as a primary method of intervention. Conclusion(s): SREI/SRS members define a "clinically significant hydrosalpinx" consistently, and actual practice among members reflects American Society for Reproductive Medicine/SRS recommendations, with variation attributed to individual patient needs. Additionally, one in four members intervene before other infertility treatments when there is a unilateral hydrosalpinx present.
AB - Objective: To describe the management of hydrosalpinges among Society for Reproduction Endocrinology and Infertility (SREI)/Society of Reproductive Surgeons (SRS) members. Design: Cross-sectional survey of SREI/SRS members. Setting: Academic and private practice-based reproductive medicine physicians. Participant(s): A total of 442 SREI and/or SRS members. Intervention(s): Internet-based survey. Main Outcome Measure(s): To understand how respondents evaluate, define, and manage hydrosalpinges. Result(s): Of 1,070 SREI and SRS members surveyed, 442 responded to all items, for a 41% response rate. Respondents represented both academic and private practice settings, and differences existed in the evaluation and management of hydrosalpinges. More than one-half (57%) perform their own hysterosalpingograms (HSGs), and 54.5% involve radiologists in their interpretation of tubal disease. Most respondents thought that a clinically significant hydrosalpinx on HSG is one that is distally occluded (80.4%) or visible on ultrasound (60%). Approximately one in four respondents remove a unilateral hydrosalpinx before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)/intrauterine insemination (IUI) and clomiphene citrate (CC)/IUI (29.3% and 22.8%, respectively), and physicians in private practice were more likely to intervene (COH: risk ratio [RR] 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.51; CC: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.33-2.95). Although laparoscopic salpingectomy was the preferred method of surgical management, nearly one-half responded that hysteroscopic tubal occlusion should have a role as a primary method of intervention. Conclusion(s): SREI/SRS members define a "clinically significant hydrosalpinx" consistently, and actual practice among members reflects American Society for Reproductive Medicine/SRS recommendations, with variation attributed to individual patient needs. Additionally, one in four members intervene before other infertility treatments when there is a unilateral hydrosalpinx present.
KW - ASRM
KW - Hydrosalpinx
KW - SREI
KW - hysteroscopic tubal occlusion
KW - in vitro fertilization
KW - salpingectomy
KW - tubal disease
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84860335947
U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.026
DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 22405598
AN - SCOPUS:84860335947
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 97
SP - 1095-1100.e2
JO - Fertility and Sterility
JF - Fertility and Sterility
IS - 5
ER -