TY - JOUR
T1 - How are we defining preoperative anemia? A comparison of various anemia thresholds among patients undergoing short-construct lumbar spinal fusion
AU - Issa, Tariq Z.
AU - Tarawneh, Omar H.
AU - Ezeonu, Teeto
AU - Lambrechts, Mark J.
AU - Kurd, Mark F.
AU - Kaye, Ian David
AU - Canseco, Jose A.
AU - Hilibrand, Alan S.
AU - Vaccaro, Alexander R.
AU - Kepler, Christopher K.
AU - Schroeder, Gregory D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.
PY - 2025/4/1
Y1 - 2025/4/1
N2 - Background: Anemia is a risk factor for increased transfusions. However, various definitions of anemia have been described in scientific literature and a consensus on how to appropriately diagnose anemia or who to preoperatively optimize is lacking. We aimed to compare multiple anemia definitions and evaluate if any threshold best predicts transfusion requirements and surgical outcomes following spinal fusion. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1-2 level posterior spinal fusions. Preoperative hemoglobin was defined based on preoperative laboratories within 28 days of surgery. Anemia was diagnosed using the World Health Organization (WHO), the American Society of Hematology (ASH), and the Cleveland Clinic (CC) thresholds. Youden's index and multivariable regressions were utilized to analyze associations of anemia with postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 2257 patients were included. Patients who received a transfusion were more likely anemic regardless of definition (WHO: 60.0% vs. 14.0%, P < 0.001; ASH: 61.0% vs. 17.8%; CC: 70.0% vs. 26.6%; all, P < 0.001). On multivariable regression, all anemia definitions were independently associated with transfusions and nonhome discharge. WHO anemia was associated with the highest odds of transfusion (odds ratio [OR]: 7.48, P < 0.001), followed by ASH anemia (OR: 6.63, P < 0.001), ASH preoperative anemia (OR: 6.45, P < 0.001), and CC anemia (OR: 5.92, P < 0.001). Only WHO anemia was associated with complications (OR: 1.55, P = 0.045). Receiver operating characteristic curves suggest that every anemia threshold was acceptable (area under the curve [AUC] >0.70) for identifying patients needing a postoperative transfusion: ASH preoperative demonstrated the greatest AUC (AUC: 0.746), followed by WHO anemia (AUC: 0.730). All performed poorly in predicting complications (AUC: 0.541-0.553), readmissions (AUC: 0.525-0.535), and nonhome discharge (AUC: 0.561-0.596). Conclusions: Small variations in anemia definitions do not significantly impact the identification of patients necessitating a transfusion. However, the more discriminative WHO definition may best predict postoperative complications for lumbar fusions.
AB - Background: Anemia is a risk factor for increased transfusions. However, various definitions of anemia have been described in scientific literature and a consensus on how to appropriately diagnose anemia or who to preoperatively optimize is lacking. We aimed to compare multiple anemia definitions and evaluate if any threshold best predicts transfusion requirements and surgical outcomes following spinal fusion. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1-2 level posterior spinal fusions. Preoperative hemoglobin was defined based on preoperative laboratories within 28 days of surgery. Anemia was diagnosed using the World Health Organization (WHO), the American Society of Hematology (ASH), and the Cleveland Clinic (CC) thresholds. Youden's index and multivariable regressions were utilized to analyze associations of anemia with postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 2257 patients were included. Patients who received a transfusion were more likely anemic regardless of definition (WHO: 60.0% vs. 14.0%, P < 0.001; ASH: 61.0% vs. 17.8%; CC: 70.0% vs. 26.6%; all, P < 0.001). On multivariable regression, all anemia definitions were independently associated with transfusions and nonhome discharge. WHO anemia was associated with the highest odds of transfusion (odds ratio [OR]: 7.48, P < 0.001), followed by ASH anemia (OR: 6.63, P < 0.001), ASH preoperative anemia (OR: 6.45, P < 0.001), and CC anemia (OR: 5.92, P < 0.001). Only WHO anemia was associated with complications (OR: 1.55, P = 0.045). Receiver operating characteristic curves suggest that every anemia threshold was acceptable (area under the curve [AUC] >0.70) for identifying patients needing a postoperative transfusion: ASH preoperative demonstrated the greatest AUC (AUC: 0.746), followed by WHO anemia (AUC: 0.730). All performed poorly in predicting complications (AUC: 0.541-0.553), readmissions (AUC: 0.525-0.535), and nonhome discharge (AUC: 0.561-0.596). Conclusions: Small variations in anemia definitions do not significantly impact the identification of patients necessitating a transfusion. However, the more discriminative WHO definition may best predict postoperative complications for lumbar fusions.
KW - Anemia
KW - complication
KW - lumbar spine
KW - spine fusion
KW - transfusion
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010032593
U2 - 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_69_25
DO - 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_69_25
M3 - Article
C2 - 40756486
AN - SCOPUS:105010032593
SN - 0974-8237
VL - 16
SP - 188
EP - 194
JO - Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
JF - Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
IS - 2
ER -