Hemodynamic responses to continuous versus pulsatile mechanical unloading of the failing left ventricle

Carlo R. Bartoli, Guruprasad A. Giridharan, Kenneth N. Litwak, Michael Sobieski, Sumanth D. Prabhu, Mark S. Slaughter, Steven C. Koenig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

64 Scopus citations


Debate exists regarding the merits and limitations of continuous versus pulsatile flow mechanical circulatory support. To characterize the hemodynamic differences between each mode of support, we investigated the acute effects of continuous versus pulsatile unloading of the failing left ventricle in a bovine model. Heart failure was induced in male calves (n = 14). During an acute study, animals were instrumented through thoracotomy for hemodynamic measurement. A continuous flow (n = 8) and/or pulsatile flow (n = 8) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was implanted and studied during maximum support (∼5 L/min) and moderate support (∼2-3 L/min) modes. Pulse pressure (PP), surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE), and (energy equivalent pressure [EEP]/mean aortic pressure (MAP)-1) × 100% were derived to characterize hemodynamic energy profiles during the different support modes. Standard hemodynamic parameters of cardiac performance were also derived. Data were analyzed by repeated measures one-way analysis of variance within groups and unpaired Student's t-tests across groups. During maximum and moderate continuous unloading, PP, SHE, and (EEP/MAP-1) × 100% were significantly decreased compared with baseline and compared with pulsatile unloading. As a result, continuous unloading significantly altered left ventricular peak systolic pressure, aortic systolic and diastolic pressure, ±dP/dt, and rate × pressure product, whereas pulsatile unloading preserved a normal profile of physiologic values. As continuous unloading increased, the pressure-volume relationship collapsed, and the aortic valve remained closed. In contrast, as pulsatile unloading increased, a comparable decrease in left ventricular volumes was noted. However, a normal range of left ventricular pressures was preserved. Continuous unloading deranged the physiologic profile of myocardial and vascular hemodynamic energy utilization, whereas pulsatile unloading preserved more normal physiologic values. These findings may have important implications for chronic LVAD therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)410-416
Number of pages7
JournalASAIO Journal
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2010


Dive into the research topics of 'Hemodynamic responses to continuous versus pulsatile mechanical unloading of the failing left ventricle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this