Hedonism vs. nihilism: No arbitrage and tests of urban economic models

  • Marcus Berliant
  • , Daniel P. McMillen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    We present two notions of "no arbitrage" in urban economic models and show that there is no model satisfying both. The standard hedonic housing model of urban economics and its generalizations are consistent with the first of these, but inconsistent with the second. We present a model consistent with the second notion of "no arbitrage" and a continuum of models consistent with neither notion that are observationally equivalent to the standard model, even if the utility function of consumers is known. Only one of these is the standard model. Thus, the available tests of the standard model cannot provide much evidence of its validity. Finally, we examine nonlinear price systems consistent with the second notion of "no arbitrage" and their welfare consequences.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)118-131
    Number of pages14
    JournalRegional Science and Urban Economics
    Volume36
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2006

    Keywords

    • Hedonic models
    • Monocentric City
    • No arbitrage

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Hedonism vs. nihilism: No arbitrage and tests of urban economic models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this