TY - JOUR
T1 - Heart waitlist survival in adults with an intra-aortic balloon pump relative to other Status 2, Status 1, and inotrope Status 3 patients
AU - Hanff, Thomas C.
AU - Browne, Adeline
AU - Dickey, Jacqueline
AU - Gaines, Holly
AU - Harhay, Michael O.
AU - Goodwin, Matt
AU - Selzman, Craig H.
AU - Fang, James C.
AU - Drakos, Stavros G.
AU - Stehlik, Josef
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Drakos reports research grants from Abbott Laboratories, Merck, and Novartis and sits on the DSMB for ARENA Pharmaceuticals. Dr Stehlik reports consulting fees for Natera, Medtronic, Sanofi-Aventis, and Transmedics. No other authors reported conflicts of interest. Dr Drakos is funded by NIH/NHLBI R01HL156667 , VA Merit I01CX002291 , and the Nora Eccles Treadwell Foundation . Dr. Stehlik is funded by NIH/NHLBI RTB-004 All-In and VA Merit Award HX002922-01A2. The content is the responsibility of the authors alone and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background: Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) utilization has significantly outpaced other Status 2 eligibility criteria for heart transplant. The risk of waitlist mortality of IABP-supported patients relative to other Status 2 listed patients has not been described. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients listed Status 2 for heart transplantation under the current U.S. allocation policy, using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. Patients listed status 1 and status 3 for high-dose inotropes were included for reference. Mortality and waitlist decompensation were modeled as a function of time-varying status in cause-specific Cox survival models. Results: We identified 3638 Status 2 listings, of whom 1676 (46%) were Status 2 due to IABP. Relative to patients supported with IABP, status 2 patients with ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation [VT/VF] (HR 4.0, p <.001), right-or-biventricular assist device configurations (HR 2.3, p =.002), or temporary surgical left ventricular assist devices [LVAD] (HR 2.6, p =.003) had greater risk of waitlist mortality and decompensation. Other Status 2 subgroups had mortality comparable to IABP Status 2. Risk of waitlist mortality and decompensation for IABP Status 2 was similar to Status 3 patients listed for high-dose inotropes (HR 1.2, p =.27) and lower than Status 1 patients (HR 0.7, p =.002). Conclusions: Waitlist mortality varies significantly by Status 2 eligibility criteria and is highest among patients listed for VT/VF, right-or-biVAD configurations, or temporary surgical LVADs. IABP-supported patients were among those with the lowest Status 2 waitlist mortality risk and comparable to Status 3 inotrope-supported patients.
AB - Background: Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) utilization has significantly outpaced other Status 2 eligibility criteria for heart transplant. The risk of waitlist mortality of IABP-supported patients relative to other Status 2 listed patients has not been described. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients listed Status 2 for heart transplantation under the current U.S. allocation policy, using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. Patients listed status 1 and status 3 for high-dose inotropes were included for reference. Mortality and waitlist decompensation were modeled as a function of time-varying status in cause-specific Cox survival models. Results: We identified 3638 Status 2 listings, of whom 1676 (46%) were Status 2 due to IABP. Relative to patients supported with IABP, status 2 patients with ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation [VT/VF] (HR 4.0, p <.001), right-or-biventricular assist device configurations (HR 2.3, p =.002), or temporary surgical left ventricular assist devices [LVAD] (HR 2.6, p =.003) had greater risk of waitlist mortality and decompensation. Other Status 2 subgroups had mortality comparable to IABP Status 2. Risk of waitlist mortality and decompensation for IABP Status 2 was similar to Status 3 patients listed for high-dose inotropes (HR 1.2, p =.27) and lower than Status 1 patients (HR 0.7, p =.002). Conclusions: Waitlist mortality varies significantly by Status 2 eligibility criteria and is highest among patients listed for VT/VF, right-or-biVAD configurations, or temporary surgical LVADs. IABP-supported patients were among those with the lowest Status 2 waitlist mortality risk and comparable to Status 3 inotrope-supported patients.
KW - heart allocation
KW - intra-aortic balloon pump
KW - temporary mechanical circulatory support
KW - waitlist survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143491714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.010
DO - 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 36369224
AN - SCOPUS:85143491714
SN - 1053-2498
VL - 42
SP - 368
EP - 376
JO - Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
JF - Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
IS - 3
ER -