TY - JOUR
T1 - Healthy adults favor stable left/right hand choices over performance at an unconstrained reach-to-grasp task
AU - Kim, Taewon
AU - Zhou, Ruiwen
AU - Gassass, Samah
AU - Soberano, Téa
AU - Liu, Lei
AU - Philip, Benjamin A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Reach-to-grasp actions are fundamental to the daily activities of human life, but few methods exist to assess individuals’ reaching and grasping actions in unconstrained environments. The Block Building Task (BBT) provides an opportunity to directly observe and quantify these actions, including left/right hand choices. Here we sought to investigate the motor and non-motor causes of left/right hand choices, and optimize the design of the BBT, by manipulating motor and non-motor difficulty in the BBT’s unconstrained reach-to-grasp task. We hypothesized that greater motor and non-motor (e.g. cognitive/perceptual) difficulty would drive increased usage of the dominant hand. To test this hypothesis, we modulated block size (large vs. small) to influence motor difficulty, and model complexity (10 vs. 5 blocks per model) to influence non-motor difficulty, in healthy adults (n = 57). Our data revealed that increased motor and non-motor difficulty led to lower task performance (slower task speed), but participants only increased use of their dominant hand only under the most difficult combination of conditions: in other words, participants allowed their performance to degrade before changing hand choices, even though participants were instructed only to optimize performance. These results demonstrate that hand choices during reach-to grasp actions are more stable than motor performance in healthy right-handed adults, but tasks with multifaceted difficulties can drive individuals to rely more on their dominant hand.
AB - Reach-to-grasp actions are fundamental to the daily activities of human life, but few methods exist to assess individuals’ reaching and grasping actions in unconstrained environments. The Block Building Task (BBT) provides an opportunity to directly observe and quantify these actions, including left/right hand choices. Here we sought to investigate the motor and non-motor causes of left/right hand choices, and optimize the design of the BBT, by manipulating motor and non-motor difficulty in the BBT’s unconstrained reach-to-grasp task. We hypothesized that greater motor and non-motor (e.g. cognitive/perceptual) difficulty would drive increased usage of the dominant hand. To test this hypothesis, we modulated block size (large vs. small) to influence motor difficulty, and model complexity (10 vs. 5 blocks per model) to influence non-motor difficulty, in healthy adults (n = 57). Our data revealed that increased motor and non-motor difficulty led to lower task performance (slower task speed), but participants only increased use of their dominant hand only under the most difficult combination of conditions: in other words, participants allowed their performance to degrade before changing hand choices, even though participants were instructed only to optimize performance. These results demonstrate that hand choices during reach-to grasp actions are more stable than motor performance in healthy right-handed adults, but tasks with multifaceted difficulties can drive individuals to rely more on their dominant hand.
KW - (4 to6): hand choice
KW - Block-building task
KW - Reaching and grasping
KW - Task difficulty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189199383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00221-024-06828-5
DO - 10.1007/s00221-024-06828-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 38563977
AN - SCOPUS:85189199383
SN - 0014-4819
VL - 242
SP - 1349
EP - 1359
JO - Experimental Brain Research
JF - Experimental Brain Research
IS - 6
ER -