TY - JOUR
T1 - Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
T2 - Better to be young
AU - Lacy, Peter D.
AU - Piccirillo, Jay F.
AU - Merritt, Michael G.
AU - Zequeira, Maria R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported in part by the American Cancer Society Junior Clinical Research Award (JCRA-1) and the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA62072) to J.F.P.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Most head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients are elderly, with few younger than 40 years. Controversy exists in the literature regarding outcomes for younger patients. The goal of this research project was to compare baseline features and outcomes for young patients (≤40 years), middle-aged patients (41-64 years), and old patients (≥65 years). To investigate the relationship between age and important presenting features and outcomes, 1160 recently diagnosed patients first treated at Washington University between 1980 and 1991 were identified from an existing database. Full 5-year survival information was available for 1030 patients (89%). Overall, the 5-year survival rate was 46% (478/1030); young patients (65%, 26/40) had a significantly better survival rate than middle-aged (52%, 292/566) or old patients (38%, 160/424) (χ2 = 24.5; P = 0.001). Survival was also related to smoking, comorbidity, primary site, TNM stage, and nodal disease. Age remained a significant factor even after we controlled for these other factors. Young patients developed fewer recurrent and new primary tumors. We conclude that young patients have a much better overall prognosis than older patients. The reasons for this difference are unclear, but it appears that the impact of age goes beyond an actuarial effect.
AB - Most head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients are elderly, with few younger than 40 years. Controversy exists in the literature regarding outcomes for younger patients. The goal of this research project was to compare baseline features and outcomes for young patients (≤40 years), middle-aged patients (41-64 years), and old patients (≥65 years). To investigate the relationship between age and important presenting features and outcomes, 1160 recently diagnosed patients first treated at Washington University between 1980 and 1991 were identified from an existing database. Full 5-year survival information was available for 1030 patients (89%). Overall, the 5-year survival rate was 46% (478/1030); young patients (65%, 26/40) had a significantly better survival rate than middle-aged (52%, 292/566) or old patients (38%, 160/424) (χ2 = 24.5; P = 0.001). Survival was also related to smoking, comorbidity, primary site, TNM stage, and nodal disease. Age remained a significant factor even after we controlled for these other factors. Young patients developed fewer recurrent and new primary tumors. We conclude that young patients have a much better overall prognosis than older patients. The reasons for this difference are unclear, but it appears that the impact of age goes beyond an actuarial effect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033973019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70249-X
DO - 10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70249-X
M3 - Article
C2 - 10652400
AN - SCOPUS:0033973019
VL - 122
SP - 253
EP - 258
JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
SN - 0194-5998
IS - 2
ER -