TY - JOUR
T1 - Has the connection between polyploidy and diversification actually been tested?
AU - Kellogg, Elizabeth A.
N1 - Funding Information:
I thank J. Chris Pires and Yves van de Peer for the invitation to present a talk in the Plant Genome Evolution symposium and to contribute this manuscript. I also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and helpful suggestions. Work in the Kellogg lab is supported by NSF grants DEB-1442071 and IOS-1413824 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Many major clades of angiosperms have several whole genome duplications (polyploidization events) in their distant past, suggesting that polyploidy drives or at least permits diversification. However, data on recently diverged groups are more equivocal, finding little evidence of elevated diversification following polyploidy. The discrepancy may be attributable at least in part to methodology. Many studies use indirect methods, such as chromosome numbers, genome size, and Ks plots, to test polyploidy, although these approaches can be misleading, and often lack sufficient resolution. A direct test of diversification following polyploidy requires a sequence-based approach that traces the history of nuclear genomes rather than species. These methods identify the point of coalescence of ancestral genomes, but may be misleading about the time and thus the extent of diversification. Limitations of existing methods mean that the connection between polyploidy and diversification has not been rigorously tested and remains unknown.
AB - Many major clades of angiosperms have several whole genome duplications (polyploidization events) in their distant past, suggesting that polyploidy drives or at least permits diversification. However, data on recently diverged groups are more equivocal, finding little evidence of elevated diversification following polyploidy. The discrepancy may be attributable at least in part to methodology. Many studies use indirect methods, such as chromosome numbers, genome size, and Ks plots, to test polyploidy, although these approaches can be misleading, and often lack sufficient resolution. A direct test of diversification following polyploidy requires a sequence-based approach that traces the history of nuclear genomes rather than species. These methods identify the point of coalescence of ancestral genomes, but may be misleading about the time and thus the extent of diversification. Limitations of existing methods mean that the connection between polyploidy and diversification has not been rigorously tested and remains unknown.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957540708&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.01.002
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26855304
AN - SCOPUS:84957540708
SN - 1369-5266
VL - 30
SP - 25
EP - 32
JO - Current Opinion in Plant Biology
JF - Current Opinion in Plant Biology
ER -