Harnessing the Plasma Proteome to Predict Mortality in Heart Failure Subpopulations

  • Jessica Chadwick
  • , Michael A. Hinterberg
  • , Folkert W. Asselbergs
  • , Hannah Biegel
  • , Eric Boersma
  • , Thomas P. Cappola
  • , Julio A. Chirinos
  • , Joseph Coresh
  • , Peter Ganz
  • , David A. Gordon
  • , Natasha Kureshi
  • , Kelsey M. Loupey
  • , Alena Orlenko
  • , Rachel Ostroff
  • , Laura Sampson
  • , Sama Shrestha
  • , Nancy K. Sweitzer
  • , Stephen A. Williams
  • , Lei Zhao
  • , Isabella Kardys
  • David E. Lanfear

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We derived and validated proteomic risk scores (PRSs) for heart failure (HF) prognosis that provide absolute risk estimates for all-cause mortality within 1 year. METHODS: Plasma samples from individuals with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; ejection fraction <40%; training/validation n=1247/762) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; ejection fraction ≥50%; training/validation n=725/785) from 3 independent studies were run on the SomaScan Assay measuring ≈5000 proteins. Machine learning techniques resulted in unique 17- and 14-protein models for HFrEF and HFpEF that predict 1-year mortality. Discrimination was assessed via C-index and 1-year area under the curve (AUC), and survival curves were visualized. PRSs were also compared with Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic HF (MAGGIC) score and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) measurements and further assessed for sensitivity to disease progression in longitudinal samples (HFrEF: n=396; 1107 samples; HFpEF: n=175; 350 samples). RESULTS: In validation, the HFpEF PRS performed significantly better (P≤0.1) for mortality prediction (C-index, 0.79; AUC, 0.82) than MAGGIC (C-index, 0.71; AUC, 0.74) and NT-proBNP (PRS C-index, 0.76 and AUC, 0.81 versus NT-proBNP C-index, 0.72 and AUC, 0.76). The HFrEF PRS performed comparably to MAGGIC (PRS C-index, 0.76 and AUC, 0.83 versus MAGGIC C-index, 0.75 and AUC, 0.84) but had a significantly better C-Index (P=0.026) than NT-proBNP (PRS C-index, 0.75 and AUC, 0.78 versus NT-proBNP C-index, 0.73 and AUC, 0.77). PRS included known HF pathophysiology biomarkers (93%) and novel proteins (7%). Longitudinal assessment revealed that HFrEF and HFpEF PRSs were higher and increased more over time in individuals who experienced a fatal event during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PRSs can provide valid, accurate, and dynamic prognostic estimates for patients with HF. This approach has the potential to improve longitudinal monitoring of patients and facilitate personalized care.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere011208
JournalCirculation: Heart Failure
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2025

Keywords

  • cardiovascular diseases
  • heart failure
  • natriuretic peptide, brain
  • prognosis
  • proteomics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Harnessing the Plasma Proteome to Predict Mortality in Heart Failure Subpopulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this