TY - JOUR
T1 - H relationship between evoked potentials and clinical status in spinal cord ischemia
AU - Kai, Yukihiro
AU - Owen, Jeffrey H.
AU - Allen, Brent T.
AU - Dobras, Manuel
AU - Davis, Chris
PY - 1995/2
Y1 - 1995/2
N2 - Study Design and Methods. Sciatic neurogenic mo- tor-evokud potentials, spinal evoked potentials, and so- matosensofy-evoked potentials were recorded ifl 12 aneslhatisad dogs that had arterial ischemia of the lum-bar cord produced by ligalion of segmental aiteries, The presence or absence of the above-mentioned potentials was compared with the clinical status of re- peeted wake-up tests. (Results. Although these results were corrplieated, sciatic neurogenic motor-evoked potential was more sensitive to the spinal cord ischemia and was a better predi-ctor of clinical outcome than spinal evoked potential and somatosensory-evoked potential. However, the presence was not a guarantee of normal function. The initial morphologic change of these potentials secondary to ischemia consisted of a decrease in amplitude and in the number of peaks without a shift Gf latency. Conclusions. The present study suggests that the peripheral neurogenic motor-evoked potential is a better warning system for spinal cord ischemia end that ils adoption may contribute to tha prevention of cord Ischemia during spinal surgery, whereas sorratosensOry- evoked potential and spinal ovokod potential cannot be indices.
AB - Study Design and Methods. Sciatic neurogenic mo- tor-evokud potentials, spinal evoked potentials, and so- matosensofy-evoked potentials were recorded ifl 12 aneslhatisad dogs that had arterial ischemia of the lum-bar cord produced by ligalion of segmental aiteries, The presence or absence of the above-mentioned potentials was compared with the clinical status of re- peeted wake-up tests. (Results. Although these results were corrplieated, sciatic neurogenic motor-evoked potential was more sensitive to the spinal cord ischemia and was a better predi-ctor of clinical outcome than spinal evoked potential and somatosensory-evoked potential. However, the presence was not a guarantee of normal function. The initial morphologic change of these potentials secondary to ischemia consisted of a decrease in amplitude and in the number of peaks without a shift Gf latency. Conclusions. The present study suggests that the peripheral neurogenic motor-evoked potential is a better warning system for spinal cord ischemia end that ils adoption may contribute to tha prevention of cord Ischemia during spinal surgery, whereas sorratosensOry- evoked potential and spinal ovokod potential cannot be indices.
KW - Sciatic neurogenic motor-evoked potential
KW - Sornatosensory-evoked potential
KW - Spinal cord ischemia
KW - Spinal evoked potential
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028878363&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00006
DO - 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00006
M3 - Article
C2 - 7732464
AN - SCOPUS:0028878363
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 20
SP - 291
EP - 296
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 3
ER -