Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Consensus Review for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma

Frédéric Amant, Anne Floquet, Michael Friedlander, Gunnar Kristensen, Sven Mahner, Eun Ji Nam, Matthew A. Powell, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Nadeem Siddiqui, Peter Sykes, Anneke M. Westermann, Beatrice Seddon

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations


Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) accounts for approximately 20% of all uterine sarcomas and presents, at a mean age, around 50 years of age. Half of the patients are premenopausal. ESS often manifests as an endometrial polyp and 60% of cases present with FIGO stage I disease. The natural history is one of slow growing indolent disease. Typical microscopic findings include a uniform population of endometrial stromal-type cells invading the myometrium and myometrial vessels. Imaging studies cannot reliably diagnose ESS preoperatively so surgical resection for a presumed fibroid is a common scenario. Hysterectomy is the cornerstone of treatment for localized ESS, but morcellation should be avoided. Systematic lymphadenectomy in ESS does not improve the outcome. Leaving the ovaries in situ does not worsen survival and this is of importance especially for young women. The data support the current practice to administer adjuvant hormonal treatment, although several questions remain, such as optimal doses, regimens (progestins or aromatase inhibitors) and duration of therapy. Repeat surgery for recurrent disease that is indolent and hormone sensitive appears to be an acceptable approach. Systemic treatment for recurrent disease is mainly hormonal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S67-S72
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Issue number9
StatePublished - Nov 2014


  • Hormonal treatment
  • Surgery for relapse
  • Surgical staging


Dive into the research topics of 'Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Consensus Review for Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this