TY - JOUR
T1 - Growth in the use of PET for six cancer types after coverage by medicare
T2 - Additive or replacement?
AU - Hillner, Bruce E.
AU - Tosteson, Anna N.
AU - Song, Yunjie
AU - Tosteson, Tor D.
AU - Onega, Tracy
AU - Goodman, David C.
AU - Siegel, Barry A.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/1
Y1 - 2012/1
N2 - Background: In July 2001, PET became a covered service for Medicare beneficiaries when used for the diagnosis, staging, and restaging of non-small-cell lung, esophageal, colorectal, and head and neck cancers as well as lymphoma and melanoma. Whether physicians use PET as a replacement for or in addition to CT, MRI, or bone scintigraphy (BS) is uncertain. Methods: A 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged > 64 years from 2004 through 2008 was used. Annually for each cancer type, a cohort of patients was created defined as having at least one admission with a primary cancer diagnosis or two nonhospital claims with a cancer diagnosis <7 days apart per calendar year. Each year, imaging claims and claim-days were counted by modality and cancer type. The sequence of PET use was examined as before, after, or instead of other imaging. Results: About 125,000 beneficiaries (2.5% of the cohort) met the cancer definition each year. In 2008, the combined annual imaging days per person-year were 2.3 for CT, 0.49 for MRI, 0.70 for PET, and 0.13 for BS. The annual rates of imaging from 2004 to 2008 increased by 0.5% for CT, 3.2% for MRI, and 18.0% for PET (range, 14.6%-19.9% by cancer type) and decreased by 12.7% for BS. The growth in PET use was not associated with meaningful changes in body CT. In 2007 and 2008, body CT preceded PET within 30 days in about half of patients, whereas PET preceded CT in only 22%. Conclusions: Several years after its introduction, PET continued to grow rapidly, with evidence that it is replacing BS. Growth of PET occurred without evidence of a decline in body CT. About half of PET use occurred shortly after body CT, suggesting an additive or final arbiter role.
AB - Background: In July 2001, PET became a covered service for Medicare beneficiaries when used for the diagnosis, staging, and restaging of non-small-cell lung, esophageal, colorectal, and head and neck cancers as well as lymphoma and melanoma. Whether physicians use PET as a replacement for or in addition to CT, MRI, or bone scintigraphy (BS) is uncertain. Methods: A 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged > 64 years from 2004 through 2008 was used. Annually for each cancer type, a cohort of patients was created defined as having at least one admission with a primary cancer diagnosis or two nonhospital claims with a cancer diagnosis <7 days apart per calendar year. Each year, imaging claims and claim-days were counted by modality and cancer type. The sequence of PET use was examined as before, after, or instead of other imaging. Results: About 125,000 beneficiaries (2.5% of the cohort) met the cancer definition each year. In 2008, the combined annual imaging days per person-year were 2.3 for CT, 0.49 for MRI, 0.70 for PET, and 0.13 for BS. The annual rates of imaging from 2004 to 2008 increased by 0.5% for CT, 3.2% for MRI, and 18.0% for PET (range, 14.6%-19.9% by cancer type) and decreased by 12.7% for BS. The growth in PET use was not associated with meaningful changes in body CT. In 2007 and 2008, body CT preceded PET within 30 days in about half of patients, whereas PET preceded CT in only 22%. Conclusions: Several years after its introduction, PET continued to grow rapidly, with evidence that it is replacing BS. Growth of PET occurred without evidence of a decline in body CT. About half of PET use occurred shortly after body CT, suggesting an additive or final arbiter role.
KW - CT
KW - MRI
KW - Medicare
KW - PET
KW - bone scintigraphy
KW - colorectal neoplasms
KW - elderly
KW - esophageal neoplasms
KW - head and neck neoplasms
KW - lung neoplasms
KW - lymphomas
KW - melanoma
KW - practice patterns
KW - time trends
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926231934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.06.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.06.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 22221634
AN - SCOPUS:84926231934
SN - 1546-1440
VL - 9
SP - 33
EP - 41
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 1
ER -