Government transparency and policymaking

  • Justin Fox

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    97 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    We argue that making lawmakers more accountable to the public by making it easier to identify their policy choices can have negative consequences. Specifically, we analyze a model of political agency with a single lawmaker and a representative voter. In our model, the lawmaker has better information than the voter about the appropriateness of alternative policy courses. In addition, the voter is uncertain about the incumbent's policy preferences - specifically, the voter is worried the incumbent is an ideologue. Our model suggests that when lawmakers expect their policy choices to be widely publicized, for those lawmakers sufficiently concerned about reelection, the desire to select policies that lead the public to believe they are unbiased will trump the incentive to select those policies that are best for their constituents. Hence, lawmakers who would do the right thing behind close doors may no longer do so when policy is determined in the open.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-44
    Number of pages22
    JournalPublic Choice
    Volume131
    Issue number1-2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Apr 2007

    Keywords

    • Government transparency
    • Political agency

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Government transparency and policymaking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this