Abstract
People are more likely to pitch in as charitable campaigns approach their goals. Such "goal gradient helping" occurs in part because late-stage efforts provide donors with a heightened sense of personal impact, an influential source of satisfaction from prosocial acts. Using web robot technology in an Internet field study of micro-lending, Study 1 demonstrated that charity contribution rates increase as recipients approach their fundraising goals. Study 2, a large-scale field experiment, found that funds close to reaching campaign goals received more donations than did funds far from reaching campaign goals. Study 3 replicated the goal gradient helping effect in a controlled scenario experiment, and mediational analyses showed that increased perceived impact of late-stage contributions, and the resultant satisfaction from this impact, explain goal gradient helping. In conclusion, people are not charitable simply to be kind or to relieve negative emotions; they find satisfaction from having personal influence in solving a social problem.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1078-1083 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2013 |
Keywords
- Decision making
- Goal-gradient hypothesis
- Motivation
- Prosocial behavior
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Goal gradient in helping behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver