TY - JOUR
T1 - Global Survey of Outcomes of Neurocritical Care Patients
T2 - Analysis of the PRINCE Study Part 2
AU - PRINCE Study Investigators
AU - Venkatasubba Rao, Chethan P.
AU - Suarez, Jose I.
AU - Martin, Renee H.
AU - Bauza, Colleen
AU - Georgiadis, Alexandros
AU - Calvillo, Eusebia
AU - Hemphill, J. Claude
AU - Sung, Gene
AU - Oddo, Mauro
AU - Taccone, Fabio Silvio
AU - LeRoux, Peter D.
AU - Domeniconi, Gustavo
AU - Camputaro, Luis Alberto
AU - Villalobos, Milton
AU - Allasia, Mariela
AU - Goldenberg, Fernando D.
AU - Teran, Mario D.
AU - Rosciani, Foda
AU - Alvarez, Hector
AU - Costilla, Marcelo
AU - Perez, Diego
AU - Raffa, Pablo
AU - Videtta, Walter
AU - Seppelt, Ian
AU - Rodgers, Helen
AU - Paxton, Jody
AU - Bhonagiri, Deepak
AU - Aneman, Anders
AU - Jenkinson, Elizabeth
AU - Bradford, Celia
AU - Finfer, Simon
AU - Yarad, Elizabeth
AU - Bass, Francess
AU - Hammond, Naomi
AU - O’Connor, Anne
AU - Bird, Simon
AU - Smith, Roger
AU - Shilkin, Jane
AU - Woods, Wpd
AU - Roberts, Brigit
AU - O’Leary, Michael
AU - Vallance, Shirley
AU - Helbok, Raimund
AU - Beer, Ronny
AU - Pfaulser, Bettina
AU - Schiefecker, Alois
AU - Almemari, Ayesha
AU - Mukaddam, Sajid
AU - Taccone, Fabio S.
AU - Dhar, Raj
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Background: Neurocritical care is devoted to the care of critically ill patients with acute neurological or neurosurgical emergencies. There is limited information regarding epidemiological data, disease characteristics, variability of clinical care, and in-hospital mortality of neurocritically ill patients worldwide. We addressed these issues in the Point PRevalence In Neurocritical CarE (PRINCE) study, a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. Methods: We recruited patients from various intensive care units (ICUs) admitted on a pre-specified date, and the investigators recorded specific clinical care activities they performed on the subjects during their first 7 days of admission or discharge (whichever came first) from their ICUs and at hospital discharge. In this manuscript, we analyzed the final data set of the study that included patient admission characteristics, disease type and severity, ICU resources, ICU and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. We present descriptive statistics to summarize data from the case report form. We tested differences between geographically grouped data using parametric and nonparametric testing as appropriate. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to evaluate factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results: We analyzed data from 1545 patients admitted to 147 participating sites from 31 countries of which most were from North America (69%, N = 1063). Globally, there was variability in patient characteristics, admission diagnosis, ICU treatment team and resource allocation, and in-hospital mortality. Seventy-three percent of the participating centers were academic, and the most common admitting diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (13%). The majority of patients were male (59%), a half of whom had at least two comorbidities, and median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality included age (OR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.04); lower GCS (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.16 for every point reduction in GCS); pupillary reactivity (OR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.23 for bilateral unreactive pupils); admission source (emergency room versus direct admission [OR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.75]; admission from a general ward versus direct admission [OR 5.85; 95% CI, 2.75 to 12.45; and admission from another ICU versus direct admission [OR 3.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 8.8]); and the absence of a dedicated neurocritical care unit (NCCU) (OR 1.7; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.47). Conclusion: PRINCE is the first study to evaluate care patterns of neurocritical patients worldwide. The data suggest that there is a wide variability in clinical care resources and patient characteristics. Neurological severity of illness and the absence of a dedicated NCCU are independent predictors of in-patient mortality.
AB - Background: Neurocritical care is devoted to the care of critically ill patients with acute neurological or neurosurgical emergencies. There is limited information regarding epidemiological data, disease characteristics, variability of clinical care, and in-hospital mortality of neurocritically ill patients worldwide. We addressed these issues in the Point PRevalence In Neurocritical CarE (PRINCE) study, a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. Methods: We recruited patients from various intensive care units (ICUs) admitted on a pre-specified date, and the investigators recorded specific clinical care activities they performed on the subjects during their first 7 days of admission or discharge (whichever came first) from their ICUs and at hospital discharge. In this manuscript, we analyzed the final data set of the study that included patient admission characteristics, disease type and severity, ICU resources, ICU and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. We present descriptive statistics to summarize data from the case report form. We tested differences between geographically grouped data using parametric and nonparametric testing as appropriate. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to evaluate factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results: We analyzed data from 1545 patients admitted to 147 participating sites from 31 countries of which most were from North America (69%, N = 1063). Globally, there was variability in patient characteristics, admission diagnosis, ICU treatment team and resource allocation, and in-hospital mortality. Seventy-three percent of the participating centers were academic, and the most common admitting diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (13%). The majority of patients were male (59%), a half of whom had at least two comorbidities, and median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality included age (OR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.04); lower GCS (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.16 for every point reduction in GCS); pupillary reactivity (OR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.23 for bilateral unreactive pupils); admission source (emergency room versus direct admission [OR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.75]; admission from a general ward versus direct admission [OR 5.85; 95% CI, 2.75 to 12.45; and admission from another ICU versus direct admission [OR 3.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 8.8]); and the absence of a dedicated neurocritical care unit (NCCU) (OR 1.7; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.47). Conclusion: PRINCE is the first study to evaluate care patterns of neurocritical patients worldwide. The data suggest that there is a wide variability in clinical care resources and patient characteristics. Neurological severity of illness and the absence of a dedicated NCCU are independent predictors of in-patient mortality.
KW - Critical care
KW - Neurocritical care
KW - Observational study
KW - Outcomes
KW - Prospective
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067830308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12028-019-00835-z
DO - 10.1007/s12028-019-00835-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 31486027
AN - SCOPUS:85067830308
SN - 1541-6933
VL - 32
SP - 88
EP - 103
JO - Neurocritical Care
JF - Neurocritical Care
IS - 1
ER -