Ghostwriters on the court? A stylistic analysis of U.S. Supreme Court opinion drafts

  • Paul J. Wahlbeck
  • , James F. Spriggs
  • , Lee Sigelman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    41 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    A common refrain among Supreme Court watchers is that today it is law clerks who are primarily responsible for drafting the justices' opinions. We search for traces of clerical drafting - identifiable stylistic "fingerprints" - in the first drafts of the opinions that two justices, Lewis F. Powell Jr., and Thurgood Marshall, circulated during the 1985 term of the Court. These two justices relied on their clerks to a different degree: Powell's office procedures called for him and several clerks to participate in writing each opinion, whereas Marshall reputedly delegated most writing responsibilities to his clerks. We do detect the clerks' distinct styles in the justices' opinions, though; as expected, the fingerprints are clearer for Marshall's clerks than for Powell's. We also find differences across opinion type, with the clerks' unique style most easily discernible in separate opinions, as opposed to majority opinions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)166-192
    Number of pages27
    JournalAmerican Politics Research
    Volume30
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ghostwriters on the court? A stylistic analysis of U.S. Supreme Court opinion drafts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this