TY - JOUR
T1 - Getting the word out
T2 - New approaches for disseminating public health science
AU - Brownson, Ross C.
AU - Eyler, Amy A.
AU - Harris, Jenine K.
AU - Moore, Justin B.
AU - Tabak, Rachel G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - The gap between discovery of public health knowledge and application in practice settings and policy development is due in part to ineffective dissemination. This article describes (1) lessons related to dissemination from related disciplines (eg, communication, agriculture, social marketing, political science), (2) current practices among researchers, (3) key audience characteristics, (4) available tools for dissemination, and (5) measures of impact. Dissemination efforts need to take into account the message, source, audience, and channel. Practitioners and policy makers can be more effectively reached via news media, social media, issue or policy briefs, one-on-one meetings, and workshops and seminars. Numerous “upstream” and “midstream” indicators of impact include changes in public perception or awareness, greater use of evidence-based interventions, and changes in policy. By employing ideas outlined in this article, scientific discoveries are more likely to be applied in public health agencies and policy-making bodies.
AB - The gap between discovery of public health knowledge and application in practice settings and policy development is due in part to ineffective dissemination. This article describes (1) lessons related to dissemination from related disciplines (eg, communication, agriculture, social marketing, political science), (2) current practices among researchers, (3) key audience characteristics, (4) available tools for dissemination, and (5) measures of impact. Dissemination efforts need to take into account the message, source, audience, and channel. Practitioners and policy makers can be more effectively reached via news media, social media, issue or policy briefs, one-on-one meetings, and workshops and seminars. Numerous “upstream” and “midstream” indicators of impact include changes in public perception or awareness, greater use of evidence-based interventions, and changes in policy. By employing ideas outlined in this article, scientific discoveries are more likely to be applied in public health agencies and policy-making bodies.
KW - Dissemination
KW - Evidence-based
KW - Policy
KW - Practice
KW - Translation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85044856622
U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000673
DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000673
M3 - Article
C2 - 28885319
AN - SCOPUS:85044856622
SN - 1078-4659
VL - 24
SP - 102
EP - 111
JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
IS - 2
ER -